Archive for: Technology

Mobile operators have notched some high profile successes in offering financial services to the poor. Think M-PESA in Kenya or GCash and Smart Money in the Philippines. They’ve have logged several million users for their mobile money transfer services which appear cheaper and more convenient than traditional banking products.

Will banks respond by emulating their new competitors from the mobile world? Banks have an appetite for offering multiple products to their clients, so it would be a boon to the poor if banks wanted to ramp up their offerings via new electronic channels. But the emerging picture is not always rosy.

Many banks see mobile as merely a threat, according to IFC’s Andi Dervishi, who leads investments in alternative-payments systems for the IFC. “Banks remain conservative. They don’t see this as a big opportunity. They are taking a more defensive position, rather than offensive, and not really going after the customer. Their business model needs to be changed.” Countries like India, China, Brazil and Russia now have more mobile phones than ATMs, giving rise to the notion that mobile will support the next wave of innovation in banking in emerging markets where low-revenue customers means banks need to find low-cost channels. But instead of jumping to explore, most banks are playing defense.

Read the rest of this page »

A recent blog post running on PCWorld highlights the idea of delivering aid via mobile phones. No doubt there’s real potential – we certainly think so. Consider how social protection grants are getting to some of the world’s poorest via bank cards in South Africa, Malawi and Kenya.

Going electronic can knock down costs of getting help to people who need it. The bar isn’t set very high: 65% of USAID’s food aid budget is consumed by the cost of delivery, for example. Handing out cash grants could be much more cost-effective, while boosting demand for local farm production. Using direct deposit with a debit card can also reduce corruption - light fingered officials siphoning off funds for the poor. So branchless banking should help with the relief industry’s traditional stumbling blocks of cost and corruption.

Read the rest of this page »

Last week a group of the world’s 25 leading medical doctors, public health professionals, development agency staff and analysts gathered in Bellagio, Italy to debate the future of mHealth, or the use of mobile phones in health systems.

This emerging field resembles mobile banking circa 2002. There are uncoordinated and relatively small pilot projects, regulators and policymakers have thought precious little about the topic, donors have no organized mechanisms for support, and there is scant public attention to the opportunities to deliver healthcare or track health information with mobiles. In a previous post, Jim Rosenberg characterized this state of play as the “technology trigger,” the first stage in the maturing of a new technology approach.

Mobile banking has clearly moved beyond that phase – indeed, with regular appearances in publications like the Financial Times, Economist, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and trade press such as The Banker, mbanking is now farther along the lifecycle towards the “peak of inflated expectations.” (See Jim’s post)

What caused this maturing of mbanking during the past 5-6 years? For one, “mobile financial services” isn’t a new topic and has been hyped before, so we may just be following a pattern. But I’d like to share one theory that I discussed this week with the mHealth experts as they think through how to advance their field. My argument consists of six different reasons.

Read the rest of this page »

Yesterday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) cautioned banks which have started offering mobile payment services to put a hold on such services until final Operative Guidelines are issued by RBI.

A draft set of mobile banking Guidelines were issued for comment in June, but are still in development. RBI signaled several times in the prior year that it planned to look in earnest at mobile financial services.

CGAP’s Notes on Regulation of Branchless Banking in India took stock of the situation earlier this year.

July 25 UPDATE: RBI has announced it will issue final m-banking guidelines within 2 weeks.

This is an excerpt from a recent CGAP paper, The Early Experience with Branchless Banking. The paper synthesizes the observations and research of the CGAP Technology Program. Gautam Ivatury and Ignacio Mas wrote the paper, with substantial input from the entire program team. This blog series will cover seven observations, four uncertainties and four predictions for branchless banking - what we call mobile banking and other technology-enabled banking solutions.

In principle, one would expect open, interoperable payments platforms to be easier to market and more successful than closed ones. Some early ventures have indeed tried to work seamlessly with existing systems, offering bank cards alongside mobile phone capability (SmartMoney, WIZZIT).

Yet other ventures have involved closed systems, through which users can transfer funds only to other members of the “club” (G-Cash, M-Pesa). Promoters of closed systems may be able to seize time-to-market advantages by not having to engage in lengthy negotiations with partners. Particularly in a context where many customers may not trust financial institutions to begin with, creating a vertically integrated end-to-end model maybe a reasonable market entry strategy rather than outsourcing key functions, such as cash handling or sales and marketing, to third-party agents or even large retail chains.

But whatever market entry strategies are used, in the long run customers will benefit more and pay less if interoperable networks allow them to transact with anyone, at any time.

What functions are involved in the ASP or SaaS model for microfinance IS/CBS?

We are looking into the different pieces of the value chain for delivering information and core banking systems through an application service provider (ASP) OR software as a service (SaaS) model. These functions may be performed by a microfinance institution (MFI), a national or regional microfinance association (MFI-A), a local IT service provider (ITSP), the ASP or SaaS vendor (Vendor), or another, new party.

ASP or SaaS models would seem particularly likely to fall short of customer expectations when it comes to support functions. One reason that MFIs are so dissatisfied with existing microfinance software vendors is that they provide poor quality support after the sale – and in particular that most of these vendors do not have local support providers in the countries in which their MFI customers operate. For example, a vendor from Ecuador may have customers in Peru but no on-the-ground support staff in that country.

Read the rest of this page »

Mobile banking has gotten more than its fair share of adulatory press coverage this year. Most exciting perhaps was April’s Sunday New York Times magazine piece that looked at the broader opportunities of mobile phones and development through the lens of the work of Jan Chipchase of Nokia fame. Last week we saw the Financial Times consider the state of microfinance with a nod towards how mobile phones could reduce transaction costs and increase the reach of financial services.

This topic is only getting more interesting. Last week I had the opportunity to speak via videolink to a conference in Brazil on how the web could revolutionize - or is revolutionizing - life in developing countries - via cell phones. That was a great conversation, organized by our friends at the World Bank and linked up to the Workshop on the Role of Mobile Technologies in Fostering Social Development, organized by the people who brought you those three w’s in your web browser, W3C.

Read the rest of this page »

Banks in the United States are increasingly outsourcing their technology. In 2007, 70% of new core technology sales to financial institutions were for outsourcing while only 30% were for in-house use (sources weren’t cited in the article). While we don’t have similar statistics for the microfinance market, I would guess that 100% of sales were for in-house use. So why are the US banks outsourcing and what does this have to do with microfinance?

Outsourcing allows banks to focus on their core competency: providing financial services. Outsourcing can also reduce operating costs, help the institution make efficient use of technology, save on investment in hardware and software, streamline reporting to management and regulators, provide access to additional functionality, improve data security, and the list goes on. The perceived benefits seem to be paying off as the number of US banks outsourcing IT is increasing, especially among medium-sized institutions.

Microfinance institutions face many of the same technology challenges as banks in the US. If technology is such a headache and outsourcing can help alleviate some of these grievances, why aren’t more MFIs outsourcing their information systems?

While there does seem to be increasing chatter on the topic, some of the big differences between microfinance institutions and US banks may explain the lag. First of all, unreliable electricity and internet connectivity is a fact of life in many (most?) MFIs. Technology providers need creative solutions to reach these markets in a way that improves upon systems already in place (i.e. more convenient and lower cost). Second, MFIs require specialized software designed for things like group loans and compulsory savings. A company which outsources for US banks, for example, would need to tailor its products and services to be compatible with the particular needs of MFIs.

Despite the potential hurdles, outsourcing appears promising for microfinance. Will the outsourcing trend transcend geographic and other boundaries?

“Standardized innovation” is the phrase used by Dialog Telekom’s (Sri Lanka) Dr. Hans Wijayasuriya at the Mobile Money Summit in Cairo today. In a phrase I think is quite useful, he was summarizing the need to have mobile banking standards, interoperability, worldwide. Right now we are observing many proprietary systems taking shape – most notably, M-PESA in Kenya, Smart Communications, and as they move further into the m-banking space, Western Union. Imagine having hundreds of transaction networks – Visas, Mastercards – that don’t talk to each other. Hopefully, that’s not the direction in which mobile banking is headed. Proprietary is fine, interoperable is essential.

Read the rest of this page »

The New York Times recently highlighted the work of Jan Chipchase, a Nokia researcher trying to understand how the poor use mobile phones. The article includes a report that Ugandans are using prepaid airtime as an informal money transfer mechanism, particularly to get value back to family in rural areas.

“Ugandans are using prepaid airtime as a way of transferring money from place to place, something that’s especially important to those who do not use banks. Someone working in Kampala, for instance, who wishes to send the equivalent of $5 back to his mother in a village will buy a $5 prepaid airtime card, but rather than entering the code into his own phone, he will call the village phone operator (“phone ladies” often run their businesses from small kiosks) and read the code to her. She then uses the airtime for her phone and completes the transaction by giving the man’s mother the money, minus a small commission.”

We’ve seen this in many countries, such as DRC (several reports on this as far back as 2005) and more recently stories of overseas Kenyans using airtime to send value home to family members in need during the post-election turmoil.

While undeniably innovative, it also shows how sub-par other money transfer options are which the poor have available to them. Prepaid airtime as a currency substitute is quite costly in percentage terms, due to VAT (while a prepaid scratchcard is bought at fave value, VAT represents a hidden increase to the cost of minutes), operator’s discount (again, built into the cost of airtime), and a commission for whoever turns it back into cash (in the Uganda example).  We estimate the all-in cost from the Uganda example at at least 25% of the value sent. That’s quite high, and not all that far off from the high fees Western Union has been lambasted for charging with small value transfers.

Still, other options could be even more costly, especially if risk-adjusted, e.g. to account for the possibility of money lost when sending money with people. And other means also come with the hard-to-quantify but very real “worry factor” of waiting days or even weeks to know if the money arrived.