Archive for: Technology

Joep Roest is a Financial Inclusion Specialist with the Pacific Financial Inclusion Programme (PFIP). PFIP is a Pacific-wide programme helping to provide sustainable financial services to low income households. It is a joint project of the UN Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and has received additional funding support from the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) and the European Union. The programme is based at the UNDP Pacific Centre in Suva Fiji.

Papua New Guinea (PNG) is a country so complex it defies easy description. A place of such diversity it hosts 850 distinct languages for a population of about 7 million. The population figure, mind you, is only a guess as nobody really knows. The landscape is so rugged that the capital, Port Moresby has no road link to any other city. To get anywhere in PNG, you walk, fly or take a boat. As such, it was only in the 1930’s that the first Western gold miners started to penetrate the interior and “discovered” the densely populated highlands where the bulk of the population lives. The miners were a sign of things to come as PNG rides the crest of a gargantuan resource boom. Over the last few years, PNG has become notorious for its high levels of crime which is a major preoccupation of all who live and work there.

State of play in PNG

Against the backdrop of PNG’s security issues and difficult geography, a means to save, store and send money is desperately needed. Mobile money looks to be the answer and typically for PNG, things have developed in their own unique way. In the last half year three providers have launched very distinct offerings, all on the same Telepin platform. Interestingly, it is not a line-up of the usual suspects as both the postal service and an MFI have entered the fray. PNG now plays host to Post’s Mobile SMK, Nationwide Microbank’s MiCash and Digicel’s (of Haiti fame) Cellmoni, with more rumoured to be waiting in the wings.

Both Post and Digicel have opted for a virtual wallet product while Nationwide has developed a real-time linkage into their core banking system. To make matters even more interesting, both Post PNG and Nationwide Microbank have partnered with Oceanic Communications Limited (OCL) to manage their agent network. Confused yet? It gets better; OCL does most of Digicel’s airtime distribution yet does not provide agency services for Cellmoni. That is, at least, where it all stands now.

Airtime distributor

As we all know, mobile money is hard, especially in places like PNG. A successful mobile money operation has to be excellent at everything, all the time. Building and maintaining an excellent agent network may be hardest part of all. It takes tremendous investment in time, resources and energy for it to work. Unfortunately there is no quick fix or technological silver bullet that ensures success. It is a long, inglorious slog. Who wouldn’t want to farm it out?

That is where OCL comes in. As an airtime distributor they seem ideally placed to play a role. They make money by getting airtime (electronic and scratch) out to the furthest reaches of this challenging country and take cash in return. Airtime distributors are operationally minded businesses where solid processes are the cornerstone of profitability. In OCL’s case, they have established relationships with 12,000 resellers. From their interactions with these resellers, they have years of data that can help predict liquidity needs and identify resellers who are prime candidates for becoming successful agents. Admittedly, airtime distribution is a far cry from mobile money agent management, yet many of the same capabilities come into play.

The opportunity

OCL is now doing much of the hard stuff on behalf of its two partners. They manage agent recruitment and training, agent monitoring and liquidity management. This frees up the mobile money operators to concentrate on their offerings. There is also the compelling possibility that OCL could drive agent interoperability and standardization of the agent experience across partners. It would make their management of the network simpler, drive down their costs and make it easier to recruit agents. This seems especially likely, as all the current products are on the same platform. Both agents and customers stand to benefit. Agents won’t have to maintain separate balances. Customers will benefit from a broader agent network, unified customer experience and an even playing field for all competitors, ensuring competitive offerings.

Will we see OCL shape mobile money in PNG due to their central role? More generally, will third-party providers become a force for standardization and interoperability in other markets?

So far…

It seems to be working. OCL’s two partners have been able to quickly expand far beyond their brick & mortar footprint. Nine months in, customer growth is strong and accelerating. If developments so far are anything to go by, there will be a lot more to write about over the coming months.

- Joep Roest -

This is the fifth and final post in our series on remittances and branchless banking.  You can read the first four posts here.  So far, we have highlighted the emerging success factors and challenges featured in our 2012 landscaping exercise.  Paolo Baltao from Globe’s GCASH shared with us the lessons learned over a period of eight years during which time he led one of the first services to link remittances to a mobile wallet.   Subsequently, Stefan Staschen explored the untapped opportunities in leveraging the large flows of remittances between Russia and Tajikistan by linking them to other financial products.  This week, we revisit the study conducted by CGAP and Dalberg Global Development Advisors, by focusing on the role of bigger players such as Western Union and BICS Homesend in consolidating existing corridors and accelerating further adoption. 

Since we started this series, new remittance data from several countries has been released by the World Bank. This newly available dataset reveals that officially recorded remittance flows to developing countries reached $372 billion in 2011, an increase of 12.1 percent over 2010. This is higher than our earlier estimate of $351 billion. While there is clearly some market potential there, so far we have seen that uptake for mobile enabled remittances services has been anaemic to say the least.

Source: CGAP & Dalberg Global Development Advisors

As our understanding of the factors that lead to customer adoption of branchless banking expands, there is a growing consensus that for international remittances services to reach a significant level of scale, they will require an existing mobile money ecosystem that allows for downstream transactions which give users access to a wider array of cost-effective services and products such as payments and access to savings.  This will provide not only value-added for consumers but also the much needed transaction revenue for providers.  It is evident that these recalibrated strategies will no longer place remittances as the core driver for adoption, but factor them in as one of the many financial services which can be provided to a customer once a branchless banking ecosystem has reached a certain level of maturity and depth.

One thing is certain: although some new innovative models have emerged, traditional remittance providers or MTOs like Western Union still have a huge advantage through the benefits they offer to partners. These include fast access to a broad range of sending countries as well as significant brand recognition and regulatory compliance, though often at the expense of their partner’s pricing power (an expense which could end up being passed on to consumers, ultimately reducing the demand for these types of services).   Nevertheless, Western Union has already launched mobile money transfer services in nine countries: Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Canada, Kenya, Madagascar, Malaysia, the Philippines, Tanzania and the U.S, and in the last couple of months, has announced strategic alliances with MTN Uganda, Roshan in Afghanistan and Tigo in Paraguay.  This move will allow senders to remit funds directly into the recipient’s mobile wallets from any of Western Union’s agent locations around the world.  It is evident that MNOs remain optimistic about deploying international remittances through mobile money, yet they are increasingly aware that the full benefits will only be realized in the long-term.  As mobile money ecosystems become more mature in these markets, these flows could play a pivotal role in consolidating corridors and accelerating adoption.

Alternately, hub providers such as BICS Homesend are now making it possible to integrate mobile wallets or money transfer systems of two different providers. Besides facilitating services that are mobile centric from sender to receiver, HomeSend can provide access to other service providers, such as MTOs and banks which can offer technical solutions to streamline domestic interoperability between systems and competing regulatory frameworks. Given their structure, Homesend is a cheaper alternative to giants such as Western Union and can provide a more flexible partnership without having to cede too much control from the side of the operator or bank.  However, they don’t have the same instant global reach and given their lack of direct interface with mobile wallet users, they are completely reliant on their partners to market and push transactions which make the issue of consumer education even more critical.

Nevertheless, operators seem to remain optimistic over the long-term opportunity to deploy international remittances through mobile money, and hope it will eventually contribute to the economic viability of their deployments through the added revenue opportunities for them and their agent networks.  It remains to be seen how these remittance flows are actually tied to specific financial products and services.  Only then will the real impact of mobile-enabled remittances on the unbanked be uncovered.

- Camilo Tellez

Pablo García Arabéhéty is an independent consultant who focuses on business model innovation in the mobile and environmental industries.  He has previously worked at the Organization of American States and the Innovation Lab at the Inter-American Development Bank.

Last December, Starbucks announced that during 2011 it processed 26 million transactions in the US through its mobile payment application. While this news was anecdotal for traditional financial service providers such as banks and credit card companies, it showed mobile network operators (MNOs) the speed with which they can be left out of the business. Their only income in this case was the data traffic generated to complete the transactions.  It is not news that the Average Revenue per User (ARPU) continues to decrease and mobile financial services are a great opportunity to reverse this trend. In mature markets such as Western Europe, the decline in ARPU has already led to a reduction of revenue. In Latin America the continued expansion of the subscriber base still enables revenue growth, but this trend will not last forever.

Source: Strategy Analytics 2012

I recently met with Tom Elliot from Strategy Analytics, a Boston-based consulting firm to discuss these issues.  Tom stressed that nowadays it is hard to find an MNO that is not developing some kind of financial service, but that nonetheless the business model is still uncertain, and what works in certain contexts is hard to replicate successfully in other markets.  Strategy Analytics’ forecasts for 2016 (see charts) do not show many signs of innovation in the industry. Their outlook is rather an inertial one where the aggregate income of the industry will flatten or decrease according to the region. These figures are more or less within the consensus of the mobile industry consulting world.  However, the promise of financial service provision is enticing for MNOs when properly implemented. M-Pesa, Safaricom’s mobile money service in Kenya, contributes 17% of total ARPU, which represents 53% of non-voice ARPU. While Kenya has its own particular market characteristics, we can use this as a best case indicator of the potential of mobile financial services. A 17% increase in ARPU in 2016 in the case of Western Europe, for example, would push income levels above those of 2007.[1]

The threat to this promise is the model à la Starbucks, where MNOs become dumb pipes. The model for obtaining significant revenues must be one in which the carriers are efficient players of the ecosystem, beyond the mere provision of connectivity to mobile phones.  Consequently, the construction of a model that avoids treating carriers as dumb pipes in the developing world requires important definitions of the core variables of the ecosystem. Depending on the definitions of these variables, very different business models can be shaped: from a scheduled savings product for house improvement targeting the unbanked, to the Starbucks model mentioned above. In each of these models, the players of the ecosystem have different roles: banks, MNOs, retailers, credit cards, etc.   In Latin America, at the time of shaping this ecosystem of mobile financial services, carriers have decided to split the risk and the investments by partnering with banks, credit card companies or both. The two most significant initiatives in the region are Wanda, a joint venture between Telefónica and Mastercard and Transfer, another JV between America Móvil and Citibank, which officially launched in Mexico this past month.

Source: Strategy Analytics 2012

The uncertain viability of the different business models explains much of the reasoning behind this decision. However, these partnerships have direct implications when defining the basic variables mentioned above, which need to be negotiated and agreed with the partners.  Banks for example, can be very good partners for cash management and identification of customers, but not so effective for other tasks. A report published this year by the World Bank, puts Latin American banks among the most expensive in the world. Expensive partners might be reluctant to embark in low margin/high volume business models. Experience shows that banks have yet to reach out with a value proposition to the 50% or 60% of unbanked households in Latin America.  On the other hand, credit card companies can be great allies for mobile payments and short-term loans, but their record in offering other financial products such as savings products is lean.

There is still little evidence in LAC to establish the conditions under which these associations can be functional to the carriers’ need to supplement their declining ARPU.  But already some points are clear. Carriers are those with the most to gain (and to lose) in this bet on mobile financial services. Their partners do not have as much at stake. Some results that would be catastrophic for MNOs, such as the Starbucks model, would leave their partners relatively well positioned.  In an industry with the current volumes exhibited in Latin America, there is ample space for a wide array of players to explore the business opportunity to provide mobile financial services for the base of the pyramid, which will hopefully result in a more tailored provision of services to those who most need it.

 

---

[1] Strategy Analytics 2012

Nick Hughes and Gautam Ivatury are two of the founding members of Signal Point Partners, a company created in 2009 to build innovative mobile services in emerging markets. Nick was previously at Vodafone, where he started M-PESA, taking it from a concept to a multi-million-dollar business in five years. Gautam’s previous role was leading the technology program at CGAP, where he focused on branchless and mobile banking.

When we launched Jipange KuSave – a mobile-only savings product – in Kenya in early 2010, our goal was to out-compete the mattress. Back then, Safaricom’s M-PESA service was in hyper-growth phase and ramping up to become the de facto national retail payment system. But even more exciting was M-PESA’s potential as a pervasive and low-cost delivery channel for a wider set of financial services.

With this in mind, we decided to attempt for savings what M-PESA had done for money transfers – get millions of Kenyans to abandon informal mechanisms and instead become our paying customers. But if Kenyans were going to save with us instead of the mattress, we’d need to solve two challenges.

First, a ‘traditional’ bank-type savings proposition would never work. Poor people have never abandoned the convenience and enforced discipline of informal savings services for a couple of percent interest.  In Jipange, the combination of micro-loans and savings in a structured program met several customer needs, notably the need for cash when cash flow is low (liquidity) and steady progress towards a lump sum (a savings goal).

Second, our costs would need to be radically low. As ING Direct had shown, “pure” mass-market savings plays can make money, but only at high volumes and low margins. And that was in developed markets with larger account balances. For us to succeed, we would need to “throw out the rulebook” and design from scratch the most efficient and lowest-cost processes to manage relationships and transactions.

With our two “first principles” in mind, we gathered the essential ammunition for an attack on the mattress:  a radical product design, drawing heavily from Stuart Rutherford’s work; a set of web-based processes to run the product solely via M-PESA (limited physical contact with customers); a stellar project lead to manage implementation; and passionate, risk-seeking funders in CGAP and FSD Trust Kenya.

Interested readers may find it useful to read more about our product development and trials here in MIT Innovations. Also, this evaluation produced by FSD Kenya. In short, the Jipange KuSave product gave customers small amounts of credit at zero interest, while placing a portion of the credit into a “forced” savings account. As customers repaid the credit at whatever speed and in whatever amounts they wished, they became eligible for a bigger zero-interest loan. By borrowing multiple times and being forced to save a portion of each loan, they gradually accumulated savings.

The short version of our battle report is this:

1. Customers are hungry for better ways to save. They deal with cash flow complexity everyday and use a range of high cost / high risk methods to achieve liquidity. Some product designers would consider blending credit and savings as too complex – that was not our experience.  Clear, structured program, yes – but too difficult for customers to grasp, no.

2. Silicon Valley-style discipline and lean startup principles are keys to success. This starts and ends with customers. We quickly acquired a first trial cohort and modified and iterated the ‘offer’ on the back of real evidence from users.

3. A brand-new, mobile-oriented deposit-taking institution has the best chance of beating the mattress. This is perhaps the most difficult stumbling block on the way to scale. Only a regulated institution can take deposits — but hungry, highly innovative regulated institutions are rare beasts.

In this fourth post in our series on interoperability, we describe interoperability at the customer-level. Read the first three posts here.

One agent. Five mobile money services (Photo taken by Ben Lyon of Kopo Kopo near Geomaps Centre in Nairobi)

In our work on interoperability, we find that there are some questions that we are unable to adequately address at the platform and agent levels alone. For instance, the opening of USSD gateways by mobile operators may allow customers of one operator to access services of another operator without either platform interconnection or agent sharing.

We identify two interoperability scenarios related to the mobile handset:

1. Customers can access their account through any SIM on the same network. For instance, one service in East Africa allows its customers to access their service from any handset as long as it is on their network.

2. Customers can access multiple accounts on one SIM. For instance, SMART in the Philippines allows customers to access SMART Money on their SMART SIM, as well as access accounts with various banks through different enabled interfaces.

Allowing customers to access their account via other SIMs or other accounts via one SIM increases the potential size of the market and increases customer convenience. In the latter case, providers may fear that customers will readily switch to another provider. MNOs run the risk that another service accessible to their subscribers will cannibalize their own service. Providers with large market share, in particular, may be less inclined to allow customers of other services to access their accounts. In addition, number portability has made it easier for customers to switch telecom providers.

Mobile money and the link between the mobile phone number and mobile financial services are supposed to help retain customers. Even if providers permit access to other services, they may use pricing, marketing and other features to try to keep customers from churning (e.g., make it hard to find the other service on the menu).

Read the rest of this page »

Today we post a guest blog by Ignacio Mas and David Porteous, both of whom need no introduction. But just in case…Ignacio is an independent consultant, associated with Bankable Frontier Associates. He is former Senior Advisor with the Financial Services for the Poor team at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and at the Technology and Business Model Innovation Program at CGAP. David is Managing Director of Bankable Frontier Associates.

Sarah Rotman blogged recently about yet another breathless announcement about the imminent arrival of the cashless society. She said and we agree that “cashless seems a bit naïve; cash lite seems more realistic although still a big challenge.” The very first part of the challenge is actually to visualize what a “cash lite” world looks like. Is it simply an ill-defined way station on the road to cashlessness, or is there a meaningful state or goal that goes with it?

We think the latter, and for us the defining characteristic is not the amount of cash (let cash do what it will!), but the availability of alternatives for the bulk of the population. It’s freedom from cash, not absence of cash. We have coined a word which encapsulates key elements of a cash lite society: LiFi (see baptismal paper here). Like WiFi, which provides retail connectivity at the edge of the internet cloud, LiFi is about connecting people to an electronic payments grid which provides Liquidity with Fidelity. WiFi is open, general-purpose broadband; LiFi is secure, special-purpose narrowband.

A LiFi world is therefore one in which every person has an electronic store of value which they can easily use to make and receive payments in real time. Just like in places with reliable on-grid electricity, we can turn on a light on-demand, knowing that it will work and that the cost of flicking the switch will be small in relation to the benefits.

Because there is no precedent for cashlessness by fiat and cash can be counted on to still be an option for a long time to come, the key challenge of LiFi is getting people to trust and want to use the LiFi payment mechanism…because it is robust, because it is safe and because it is useful. All these attributes take time to demonstrate to the satisfaction of risk- (and change-) averse users. A LiFi approach recognizes that in two ways.

Read the rest of this page »

Our discussions on branchless banking on this blog do not often touch on the role of microfinance institutions (MFIs). The main actors in this space seem to be mobile network operators, commercial banks, larger microfinance banks and technology companies. We have done a bit of thinking on microfinance and mobile banking, notably in this Focus Note and at this Virtual Conference.

In our last post of the year, we bring the discussion squarely back to the role technology can play for MFIs. Our guest author is Leo Tobias, Grameen Foundation’s Technology Program Manager of the Solutions for the Poorest Microsavings Initiative. 

Cashpor Officer processing loan payments on mobile

Grameen Foundation’s Microsavings Initiative is a three-year project funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It was launched in November 2009 with a goal of reaching 1.45 million new savers across 3 MFIs in the Philippines, India and Ethiopia.

Offering voluntary savings is demanding. Financial institutions compete with the alternatives that exist to formal savings accounts (home, relatives, neighbors, etc.). A common theme in our savings market research is the customer’s desire to have easy and convenient access to their funds. To deliver on those desires, our MFI partners face common technology challenges.

Here are two major challenges:

1. Front End Technologies 

To meet customer demands, financial institutions must develop delivery channels that offer accessibility and close proximity to the end client.

Selecting the right technology is an important first step. The 3 MFIs are at various stages of investigating or implementing mobile technology. In India, CASHPOR (CASHPOR Micro Credit) incorporated mobile in both their credit and savings processes. In the Philippines, CARD Bank (Center for Agricultural and Rural Development) implemented an SMS system for an on-demand savings deposit pickup service. The use of mobile phones is clearly a powerful venue for bringing the transaction closer to customers. However, it is not the only technology to be considered.

In Ethiopia, ACSI (Amhara Credit and Saving Institution) is planning to use cards (most likely smart cards) and POS devices as their first front end technology implementation. With only approximately 14% mobile penetration in the country, all indicators point to the fact that the majority of the rural poor will not have access to mobile phones in the next couple of years. In the Philippines, the majority of microfinance customers are in provinces classified as “urban” or “semi-urban”. In many of these areas, ATM machines are accessible. CARD Bank chose to provide access to the national and international network of ATMs as a feature of its voluntary savings product in addition to the use of mobile phones.

Integrating all the sophisticated technology requires the help of external providers who can bring a wide array of specialized expertise to the organization.  However, managing relationships with outside technical providers can be new and difficult since most of the technical needs of MFIs had previously been met by in-house expertise.

The MFIs are ultimately responsible for the relationship with their customers.  The MFIs therefore have to provide the training and support needed to make sure members are comfortable with and trust the technology. A component of our holistic program has been to recognize this need and to develop educational programs to introduce not only the savings products but the technology associated with them.

2. Core Infrastructure Upgrades

Read the rest of this page »

ASHAs (Accredited State Health Activists) in Bihar receiving their incentive payments through Eko's mobile money transfer service

We often write on this blog about the potential to link government-to-person (G2P) payments to financial services. We also closely follow branchless banking developments in India and have recently shared our take on the market. So imagine our excitement when we can talk about both together!

India is just one of a handful of countries that is implementing financially-linked G2P payments at scale. And of course, “scale” in India – a country with nearly 1.2 billion people – means something a bit bigger than in most countries. In India in 2008-2009, 22 welfare schemes paid out a total $65 billion to tens of millions of Indians – which doesn’t even include the substantial G2P flows for government salaries and small savings schemes. The yearly budget of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS), one of two welfare schemes that dominate the G2P payments space is $6.7 billion. And, most excitingly from our perspective, these schemes are leveraging emerging branchless banking models to disburse these payments, moving from the former branch- and cash-based distribution model to the distribution of funds into no-frills bank accounts serviced by business correspondents outside of branches.

Not surprisingly, though, this is only the start of the story. While the ambitious link of G2P payments to bank accounts is exciting and can be a source of learning and inspiration for other countries, challenges and complexities persist. We visited India this summer to learn more about G2P payments as they relate to financial inclusion. Our full overview note is available here, but here’s a summary of our key insights.

• State governments exercise significant control over the management and administration of central government-mandated G2P schemes, and there is great variability in the fees paid by state governments to banks for disbursing funds to citizens – some states pay 2% of values disbursed (or more), but others refuse to pay anything. This weakens the business case for banks and fails to generate enough money to feed the many mouths in the G2P value chain.
• Business correspondent network managers (BCNMs) are particularly squeezed, as they must compensate their network to keep them engaged and reliable, but the current fee structures from banks leave little money left over.
• In the absence of transaction fees, many banks appear motivated to disburse G2P transfers because they view this as a “foot in the door” for future business from governments, an especially compelling prospect for private banks who have traditionally been boxed out of this business by public-sector banks.

Read the rest of this page »

On a recent visit to Bangladesh Sarah Rotman and I met with Post Office Director General, Mobasherur Rahman, at his office in the middle of busy downtown Dhaka to hear about his foray into the world of branchless banking.

Rahman escorts us through winding corridors, deep into the heart of the Bangladesh Post Office headquarters, to a room unlike any other in the enormous building. Outside an innocuous looking door are about twenty pairs of shoes watched over by a small security camera. We were politely asked to remove our shoes and were shown into the room.

The Post Office now offers two branchless banking services. The longest established service, which was launched in March 2010, is the Electronic Money Transfer Service (EMTS) which allows customers to instantly send money from one branch to a friend or relative who can pick up the funds at 2,000 of the 10,000 post office branches. EMTS, it is envisaged, will soon replace the traditional money order. Post office staff use either a web interface, for those with internet connectivity, or a menu on a specially equipped mobile phone to key in information about the sender and receiver. There is also an option for a free text to be sent to the recipient notifying them of the transfer.

As we enter we are greeted by a blast of icy air from a room where the environment is carefully controlled – other post office staff have to brave the Dhaka heat and humidity with only the aid of a fan. In front of us is a small call center where half a dozen people are answering questions from post office staff and customers about the service. The other half of the room is taken up with huge server racks and we watch as transactions are processed, flashing up on the screen for a few seconds before the next transaction takes its place. Over two million transfers have now been carried out and the system now processes 14,000 transactions per day. As if to answer our questions about what happens in the event of a power cut, the lights momentarily dim and we hear a generator automatically start up in the background. The servers keep humming throughout and there is no let-up in the transactions popping up on the screen.

Read the rest of this page »

We’ve been profiling the state of play of the branchless banking industry in various countries over the last few weeks. Today we look at a region of the world that is in many ways in a class by itself. The West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU), or UEMOA in French, is a customs and monetary union of the republics of Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. The Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) is the common central bank of the eight member states. Here is our summary note on the branchless banking industry in WAEMU. Et voici la version en français.*

The other country notes we’ve released are for countries that are already considered middle-income or are very near to reaching this status (Brazil, Mexico, Pakistan, India, Ghana, South Africa). I would argue that WAEMU is the most challenging of the countries/regions from this list for the development of branchless banking. The 8 countries in WAEMU have a total population of 95 million and include many of the poorest countries in the world. 74% of the region’s population lives on less than $2 per day, and all countries in the region rank in the bottom 12% of countries in the human development index.

Access to finance in WAEMU is very low, even by comparison to other regions of Africa.  The rate of bancarization announced by the BCEAO in December 2010 was 9.5% and 12.7% of the population had an account with an MFI.

Yet the WAEMU region has recently seen a significant amount of private sector activity in branchless banking (see a summary chart of activities). The single overarching regulatory framework in the BCEAO enables private actors to leverage regional investments at lower costs. This regional diversity also provides the opportunity to understand the impact that market aspects have on branchless banking in an environment where the regulation is constant. For these reasons, WAEMU is a unique place to push branchless banking and a region where the need for increased access to financial services is one of the greatest in the world.

Opportunities for branchless banking in WAEMU:

• Regulation allows for nonbank e-money issuers leading to different and unique business models. The BCEAO was one of the first regulators globally to pass regulation expressly permitting nonbank e-money issuers in 2006, and it remains one of a few central banks that allow this role by nonbanks. Interestingly, none of the MNOs have opted for this license, while MNOs in other parts of the world long to have this option. Three nonbank institutions have received the e-money issuer licenses from the BCEAO. This regulation expands the realm of possibility in terms of the actors that can get involved in branchless banking and the types of services that can be offered. Read the rest of this page »