Archive for: Kenya

Why has M-PESA become so popular in Kenya?

by Jim Rosenberg: Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Olga Morawczynski is a doctoral candidate at the University of Edinburgh. She has spent over 9 months investigating customer adoption and usage in both urban and rural Kenya. Below are some of her observations from the field.


It is early morning in Bukura, a small village in Western Kenya. The shop-keeper and his wife are preparing to open their small store, which sells household commodities such as flour and cooking oil. They also offer M-PESA services. There is already a queue outside. A group of about twenty villagers are crowding the entrance. “It is always like this,” the shop-keeper complains while pointing to the crowd. “Since we have become M-PESA agents we have no time to rest. This thing has even over-run our other business”. He then holds up a packet of sugar. “We have not sold any sugar in months. They only want M-PESA”. Not just the Bukura agent has seen a great demand for M-PESA services. Since its introduction in March of 2007, the M-PESA application has had great success all over Kenya. There are currently over 2.3 million registered users. Over 18 Billion Ksh had been moved through the system, via person-to-person transfers.

Some of the work that I have been doing makes several arguments as to why M-PESA has become so popular. Firstly, it is the young, male, urban migrants who are driving the uptake of services – customer adoption. These migrants are what innovation researchers call ‘early adopters’ of a technology. They are usually better educated and earn higher incomes than those in the village. Because these migrants are the senders, they can choose the channel for money transfer. They then influence recipients in the rural area—who are usually female, less educated and poorer—to also use M-PESA. This segment is referred to as the ‘technology laggards’. They are usually the last, and often the least likely, to adopt an innovation.

This research also notes some barriers to adoption. Both agents and customers complain of cash float problems, especially in the rural areas. Because the majority of transactions in the village are withdrawals, agents must maintain their cash float. They do this by making frequent trips to the bank. This can be problematic if the agent is not close to an urban centre, where most banks in Kenya are located. An agent in Malaha, a small village in Western Kenya, commented, “almost every day I ride my bicycle to Kakamega to top-up my float. This takes me almost three hours. I have to leave at 6am because I want to be there when the bank opens. I must then come back again and serve my customers”. When asked if there was any other means of transport to Kakamega, the agent shook his head. He said that he was several kilometres away from the main road. He also said that he could not afford to pay the 200 ksh fee for the matatu (shared taxi).

Despite these cash float problems, the majority of customers in both the urban and rural areas assert that they prefer M-PESA over other money transfer services. This means that M-PESA must be offering them some kind of substantial benefit. In Bukura, this benefit comes in the form of savings on transport. Customers do not need to travel into Kakamega, the nearest town, to access the service. One elderly farmer commented that “I can just walk from my shamba (farm) and get money. I don’t have to spend and go into town. If the agent does not have cash today, then I will come back tomorrow. It is cheaper to wait”. Finding strategies to manage the cash float problem will undoubtedly be one of the greatest challenges for Safaricom. For now, however, it seems like customers are willing to accept the inefficiencies of the service. It is, after all, cheaper to wait.

Geography: Africa Kenya

Type:

Comments: 5 Comments

Can M-PESA work for microfinance clients?

by Mark Pickens: Wednesday, May 28, 2008

A Jamii Bora client - using point of sale. Photo by Mark Pickens.Jamii Bora is a rapidly growing Kenyan MFI which is using 200 handheld terminals with their 185,000 members, via 72 branches and 142 outlets in 13 locations across the country. JB staff are adamant that going electronic has allowed their back office to keep up with the rapidly growing numbers of clients coming through the front door. The Sagem-branded POS terminals are equipped with a magnetic stripe reader for debit cards, an alphanumeric keypad, display screen, and thumbprint reader. They connect to the MFI’s core banking system via GPRS over the local mobile networks. Jamii Bora has re-engineered its processes so that nearly all transactions are completed via the POS, the client’s debit card, and their thumbprint as identification.
Clients have more confidence in printed rather than handwritten receipts. This is particularly important for Jamii Bora’s clients, who organize in 5-person groups and usually send 1 member with all of their repayments and deposits. The POS application has been customized to print out itemized receipts which group members can use to verify transactions were correctly completed. The migration to electronic has also radically sped up data processing. Clients can see their money in the account the next day, which is valuable as Jamii Bora ties loan size to the amount of savings on deposit. And the MFI can also see the end of day cash position for its 72 branches, a simple but critical piece of data for management.

Read the rest of this page »

Geography: Africa Kenya

Type:

Comments: No Comments

Guest Post: Central Bank of Kenya - branchless banking goes rural

by Jim Rosenberg: Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Stefan Staschen works with CGAP’s technology and policy teams.  

Kenya’s banking law and regulations look all too familiar: if an institution accepts deposits and uses this money for lending or investment, it needs to have a bank licence. And banks can only transact through their head office or branches. Full stop. But the Central Bank of Kenya has realized that operating through full-fledged branches, which are subject to detailed regulatory requirements, is a very expensive proposition. If the huge gap of banking services in remote and rural areas is ever to be closed, alternative delivery models will be required. Branchless banking models such as mobile phone banking (pioneered in Kenya by M-Pesa, which is run by a mobile network operator and not a bank) and the use of retail agents will be low-cost alternatives allowing for increased rural penetration. The Central Bank Governor, Prof Njuguna Ndung’u, has now pledged to institute necessary regulatory changes allowing banks to offer financial services outside bank branches.

Mobile meets the world of central banks

by Mark Pickens: Wednesday, March 26, 2008

wizzit.JPGMobile operators find navigating financial regulation isn’t quite so easy as sailing through the telco world.

If they want to convince central bankers that hold the keys to the payments space, mobile operators will make persuasive arguments about how mobile financial services meet traditional thinking about deposits, the new domain of payment system regulation, and the hot button issue of anti-money laundering, especially when sending money across borders.

No operator better illustrates this than Vodafone and its M-PESA money transfer service. Read the rest of this page »

Microfinance Technology Headlines for Feb. 25, 2008

by Jim Rosenberg: Monday, February 25, 2008

Who Says Cash is Frictionless?

by Mark Pickens: Wednesday, February 6, 2008

cashhand3jpg.jpegConventional wisdom says cash is king. It’s cheap to use, attracting no fees or minimum balances, unlike credit and debit cards.

But the equation can radically change in emerging markets, making cash unduly expensive for financial service providers and clients alike.

Up to 70% of the 2000 ATMs installed in Pakistan are reportedly unable to dispense cash accurately. Pakistan’s has two Rs 1,000 notes in circulation, and the quality of the notes themselves can vary dramatically. As a result, ATMs routinely jam, or fail to accurately count notes dispensed. Branch-housed machines are repaired more quickly, but even there the error rate is reportedly 30%, according to a study by ShoreBank International. Consumers shy away from using ATMs, and banks’ investment in ATMs yields a diminished return, rather than cost savings they may have hoped for as customers are reluctant to give up the teller window for ATMs.

In Kenya, cash represents risk for ordinary people sending money home. Friends and bus companies are the preferred way to send money to family in other parts of the country, according to FinAccess, a nationwide survey of financial service behavior. However, Kenyans are quick to cite neither is perfect: money can too easily go “missing” with friends, and though bus companies are more reliable, the transit times are still long (often days). By contrast, clients of M-PESA, Safaricom’s mobile wallet service, say its cheaper for both them and their family, as there is often a Safaricom agent close by which will receive or dispense cash.

Cash can be costly for providers and clients alike. Moving transactions into electronic channels could make services more affordable to offer and use.

Geography: Kenya, Pakistan

Type:

Comments: No Comments

CGAP Releases Focus Note 43: Branchless Banking - Innovations Create Opportunity to Serve the Poor

by Jim Rosenberg: Thursday, January 31, 2008

Focus Note 43 examines policy and regulation around mobile banking and other technologiesMobile banking and other technologies need a balanced regulatory approach

Washington D.C. (January 31, 2008) – Basic, everyday financial services are out of reach for more than two billion people in developing countries. But the rapid growth of branchless banking – including mobile phone banking – is reducing the cost and expanding the availability of such services.

“All of this innovation presents challenges and opportunities for regulators,” says Elizabeth Littlefield, CEO of CGAP. “Policy will determine not only where branchless banking is allowed, but also which business models turn out to make economic sense - and how far they will go in reaching poor people.”

Regulating Transformational Branchless Banking is a product of collaboration between CGAP and the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID), in partnership with the GSM Association, the global trade association for over 700 mobile phone operators. The authors also benefited from conducting three of seven diagnostic missions with the World Bank’s Financial Markets Integrity Unit.

Read the rest of this page »

Agents at the center: reaching low-income clients

by Mark Pickens: Wednesday, December 5, 2007

373301054_0de0da20cejpg.jpegBurried in the Economist’s recent article on “The frontier of finance” was the little number that M-PESA is about to hit 1 million users signed up for its mobile payments service in Kenya. So what: mobile banking is gathering steam. That’s old news.

But lost in all the buzz is the critical role third-party agents serve in the play for millions of low-income clients. A broad range of corner stores, petrol stations, lottery kiosks, post offices and other outlets feature prominently in the system architecture for such success stories as Safaricom’s M-PESA in Kenya, as well as in other countries, such as Globe Telecom’s GCash service in the Philippines.

Read the rest of this page »

Geography: Kenya, Philippines

Type:

Comments: No Comments

Microfinance Technology Headlines for Nov. 27, 2007

by Jim Rosenberg: Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Pakistan: State Bank issues draft policy
The launch of Branchless Banking (BB) by using delivery channels such as retail agents and mobile phones was announced Saturday by State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) Governor Dr Shamshad Akhtar.  The new system offers a significantly cheaper alternative to conventional branch-based banking and allows financial institutions and other commercial players to offer financial services outside the premises of traditional banks. BB can be used to substantially increase the outreach of financial services to “un-banked” communities. The provision of enabling a regulatory environment by careful risk-reward balancing is, however, necessary to use such models. (CGAP related resource)

Read the rest of this page »

When is mobile banking not banking?

by Mark Pickens: Monday, November 19, 2007

content2jpg.jpegSmall differences in the wording of a law can translate into a loophole big enough to drive a truck through, or a couple of the world’s largest mobile phone companies. In Kenya, the presence of the word “and” in a definition of banking in the country’s Banking Act gave Vodafone ample space to launch M-PESA, a mobile wallet with most of the functionality of a traditional transactional bank account. M-PESA is nearing 1 million registered users (in a country with less than 3 million bank accounts), but Safaricom, Vodafone’s local affiliate, is not currently regulated by the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK). Why? M-PESA isn’t banking, at least right now.

In the Philippines, another pioneer, Globe’s GCash mobile wallet, isn’t classified as banking either, but it is regulated by the central bank, unlike M-PESA (for now). What’s going on? Is there cause for concern? While Vodafone operates in a vaccum, the Philippines central bank crafted a special regulatory window that not only gives Globe’s GCash permission to operate, but gives the central bank the authority it needs to see mobile payments is safe for consumers and the financial system. Read the rest of this page »