Can mobile money be profitable? We asked mobile money managers

by Karina Baba : Thursday, September 16, 2010

This post was written by Karina Baba, who just completed a summer fellowship with the CGAP Technology Program.

Is mobile money a viable business in its own right? Or will it only make a positive contribution to the bottom line through indirect benefits?

This past summer, we decided to ask mobile network operators (MNOs) directly what they expect from mobile money (defined here as remittances and other payment services via mobile) – Will it make money? When? And what does it mean for their core business? The results provide some of the first insights into how mobile money managers perceive the potential contribution of mobile money to their businesses and how they are selling the service internally.

We surveyed over 20 senior managers from some of the major mobile network operators in over 15 markets. 64 percent of the respondents launched mobile money in the past year. 70 percent claim to already reach over half-a-million customers each with transfers or bill payments or both.

Here are some of the highlights from the results:

Will it make money?

  • Considering mobile money on its own as a source of revenue, about 70 percent of the managers who responded agree to a certain extent that this service will be a significant source of revenue for MNOs, making large profits over time. A majority of the respondents view mobile money more as a new source of revenue (63 percent) than as a strategy to acquire new customers (50 percent).
  • Most mobile money managers expect mobile money to contribute to 30 percent of the overall revenue of the MNO in eight years with the mobile money business seeing positive cash flows within three years. All but one respondent expected that mobile money would make at least 10 percent of overall revenue and it would take five years to achieve that goal.

Will it make money on its own?

  • Only 9 percent of MNOs believe mobile money doesn’t need to be self-sustainable. However, mobile money managers expect the business case for mobile money to rest as much on direct revenues as indirect revenues (indirect revenues largely referring to cost savings from selling airtime via mobile money and from the reduction in customer churn). When asked to distribute points among all benefits based on importance to the business case, direct revenues, reduction in cost of sales and reduction in churn received roughly the same amount of points each.

What can be done to improve profitability?

  • Mobile network operators gave roughly equal importance to restructuring agent commissions as to renegotiating technology platform costs as ways to improve the profitability of the mobile money business. Getting agent commissions right is central to the mobile money business but the importance given to technology was a bit unexpected. It is possible that mobile operators, as technology intensive companies, may not be comfortable with outsourcing technology.

In summary, mobile money managers expect mobile money to be a major source of revenue and to make money on its own. But it will be a number of years before it can contribute in any notable way to the overall bottom line of the MNO, and the business will need help from indirect benefits. You can download the full results of the survey here.

- Karina Baba

 

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

4 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. September 16th, 2010 at 12:07 pm, Mark Flaming ()

    Good to see enthusiam because at this point in the industry it is looking like mobile money implementations will require patience and innovation from investors and operators alike.

    I am still unsettled by anomolies between what we can observe about the economics of these mobile money supply channels and these optimistic expectations.

    For example, M-PESA (arguably the most profitabe implementation) generated less than 8% of total Safaricom revenue in FY10, and yet these managers are still thinking about a 30% contribution?
    And we are finding that the commission structure for agents does not yet support a viable biz model for the agents in many implementations, but these managers think they will optimize their revenue stream with getting the commission structure “right.”

    I have been modeling mobile money implementations enough to understand the basic parameters of the business case and I frequently encounter business models that are missing key pieces of the basic equation. This is perfectly normal in the early stages of the new, new thing. Good that we are finding enthusiasm because that might keep the momentum going until we sort out some of the issues that Ignacio has recently outlined for us. But hope is not a method. Time for some good financial modeling.

  • September 16th, 2010 at 12:36 pm, Kabir ()

    Thanks, Mark, for your comment. What I found most interesting is that the MNOs are looking at indirect benefits as an important part of the business case. So while mobile money managers remain optimistic of the business (perhaps too optimistic, as you note), they are looking at the business case more completely, as we would encourage them to. You and I have discussed this in the past. And, as we expected, in terms of indirect benefits, cost savings from churn reduction and cost savings from selling air time via mobile money rank high in their calculations. While we don’t have conclusive evidence, we are going to post more on this blog on the indirect benefits for this type of business in branchless banking.

  • September 17th, 2010 at 12:57 pm, Jason Hahn ()

    Hi I am curious as to your hypothesis before you started the survey. It seems to me, by the nature of their job, that mobile money managers would be naturally bullish on the future of their function. I doubt many could go to their CEO and state that they will not be cash flow positive in 3 years. I’m just not sure that your sample is the one that can objectively answer the question.

  • September 18th, 2010 at 7:45 am, Kabir ()

    You are right. The title of this blog should have read -”…We asked mobile money managers, to begin with.” To understand the business case, we have to look closely at a couple of businesses at least, which is something we are doing. But we wanted to begin with understanding what mobile money managers as a group were expecting (or selling internally…) so our subsequent analyses and research could be made relevant to them as a group. I actually expected more bravado from mobile money managers, to be honest with you. A number of these businesses are monopolies in their core voice business. But it has taken these guys longer than they expected to launch the business and as the uptake does not match their expectations, they are starting to think more seriously about indirect benefits.

  • Leave a Reply