More from India: Can branchless banking be distributed like Coca-Cola?

by Claudia McKay : Wednesday, May 12, 2010

In the past few weeks, my colleagues have blogged about our study of agent networks in India. You can see our overall analysis of agents (called CSPs or Customer Service Points in India) here. The India research was one part of a three-country study (along with Brazil and Kenya) that highlights the critical role agents play as the key interface between a branchless banking service and its customers.

However, a mobile network operator (MNO) or bank rarely liaises directly with each individual agent. Instead, they rely on middlemen who manage anywhere from 10 to several hundred agents. Called different names in various countries (such as distributors or aggregators), in India they are called Super CSPs (SCSPs). EKO’s SCSPs are particularly interesting as they sell EKO’s service along with other products for major FMCG, MNO and pharmaceutical companies.

In India, a single distributor for a company like Coca-Cola (or Airtel or Nestle) works with several hundred retailers who sell Coca-Cola’s products. The distributor is responsible for selecting retailers, managing inventory, picking up/delivering cash and managing paperwork (e.g., for SIM registrations). Is it feasible for a distributor to add mobile banking to the other products they sell? Although the basic responsibilities are the same, m-banking is new to customers and retailers and so SCSPs must take on a more hands-on role. They must answer retailers’ questions, decide which retailers would make good agents, and ensure that they meet sales targets. The SCSP also manages cash and e-float directly with agents and takes agents’ cash to the bank for them. Typically, a distributor hires dedicated employees for each major product line. For m-banking, a SCSP will need one full-time employee for every 50 agents or so. In return, SCSPs receive a commission for each new account opened as well as for ongoing transactions.

So what is the business case for SCSPs? It is too early to answer this question definitively, but one SCSP from East Delhi, Mr. Sinha*, provides some clues. He has worked as a distributor for two major FMCG chains for over five years and makes about $4,500 profit a month. Mr. Sinha has just added EKO’s product to his existing distribution business in December 2009. He is very enthusiastic about EKO’s business potential and says it meets a real, unmet need in the Indian population. He has signed up 70 of his existing retailers to act as EKO agents. In January, his agents opened just 500 accounts but by February this had jumped to 2,000 accounts with 3,000 expected in March. In February, he made $650 profit from EKO business (equivalent to 14% of his distributor profits). Although this is promising, Mr. Sinha expects to make at least $1,000 a month from this business once his retailers have opened more accounts.

Mr. Sinha essentially requires a 20% increase in total profits for m-banking to be worth the effort. His EKO business is in a growth phase currently and time will tell how realistic these expectations are. One thing is clear: getting the business model right for SCSPs like Mr. Sinha will be critical in order for mobile money providers to build scalable agent networks.

* Names have been changed

-Claudia McKay

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

7 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. May 12th, 2010 at 10:24 pm, Deepak ()

    Hi

    I would like to add that whatever mentioned above seems to be very lucrative, but I don’t think its that easy. In FMCG, you sell the product, take the commission and that’s it, but whenever a bank customer is created, then you are bound to serve that customer as well. I am not sure about the figures mentioned (USD 650) involves cost of just opening the bank account or service the customer for a month or year as well.

    Moreover could you please provide some highlight on EKO products?

    Thanks

  • May 13th, 2010 at 9:24 am, Claudia ()

    Deepak – You are completely right that selling a very new product like m-banking is different from an FMCG product. Karuna’s blog post from April 27 on grass-roots marketing discusses how agents for EKO take on a much bigger role as it is a ‘push’ product that needs to be actively sold to customers instead of a ‘pull’ product that customers demand. The commissions that both CSPs and SCSPs receive are both from registering new customers and from servicing existing customers (they get paid for processing deposits and withdrawals). So, the $650 amount includes both opening accounts and servicing customers for the month of February. EKO offers a State Bank of India mini savings account with a domestic money transfer feature. You can download their product features here: http://eko.co.in/products.

    Thanks, Claudia

  • May 30th, 2010 at 10:15 pm, Kiran Hejmadi ()

    We have been using this model at Atom Technologies. We target mid-sized distributors from the FMCG/Telecom segment who are keen to include an additional revenue stream to their existing setup.

    To make this offering interesting and a viable business proposition for the SCSP and the CSP, we have packaged it under the brand name of ‘SUGAM’, where banking is one of the service options along with other lucrative services options like mobile recharges, train ticketing, bus ticketing, bill payment etc.

    Atom currently is working with State Bank of India to offer mini savings account service in rural India and urban slum pockets.

  • May 31st, 2010 at 1:39 am, avn ()

    Selling a coke is different from selling and servicing a bank a/c, currently eko is not even know to many people from financial service industry let alone the Indian mass. Eko can face major issues with regard to AML and KYC as soon as they spead the wings. Also no information is available with regard to the financial status of Eko as a company, unless the company has deep pocket how will they set up a distribution network in a large country like India. Regards AV Nair

  • May 31st, 2010 at 1:40 am, avn ()

    Selling a coke is different from selling and servicing a bank a/c, currently eko is not even know to many people from financial service industry let alone the Indian mass. Eko can face major issues with regard to AML and KYC as soon as they spead the wings. Also no information is available with regard to the financial status of Eko as a company, unless the company has deep pocket how will they set up a distribution network in a large country like India. Regards AVN

  • June 1st, 2010 at 10:05 pm, Deepak ()

    I am not able to digest how this kind of model is feasible. As per the offerings, customer is created instantly and he/she can do the transactions. But actual creation of customer in bank CBS will take minimum 3-4 days. In that duration, customer is allowed to do transaction without KYC/ AML check.

    What happened in case the KYC failed for the customer at bank’s end?

  • June 2nd, 2010 at 4:07 am, Anil Kumar ()

    Hi Claudia,
    Interesting to read your article. This model is sure applying conventional commercial logic to solve a retailing challenge for banking.

    Two things come to mind.
    1-In our work, we have noticed that while opening an account is an important hurdle to crack, the bigger one is ensuring transactions happen in the accounts. I say this, since the business model of entire distribution and retailing is dependent on transactions (since they are paid per transaction basis usually). It is the classic puzzle of “we built it, but they didn’t come”. How do you propose to get customers to transact?

    2-My second question was about replicability and is linked to the previous one. A distributor led retailing structure takes away the pain of managing the network and promises easy replicability. However, paradoxically, the more you replicate, the more you slice the customer base and hence, affect the business case for a particular retailer. An FMCG network is set up after careful demand estimation of an area and care is taken that retailers aren’t poaching into the other’s market heavily. I believe, in this structure, the customer account can be operated from any of the EKO setups (correct me if I am wrong) just a conventional ATM. In such a case when the account holder is free to use any EKO point, how does one assure the returns for each of the retailer in the long run?

    3-Thirdly, our work is based on the fact that the poor has an overwhelming temptation to consume today because he/she has a very pessimistic view of her tomorrow’s self. In such situations, asking her to save becomes tricky because it goes down in her priority list. I am keen to hear your thoughts (or from the organization running this product) on how to tackle this.

    Regards,
    Anil Kumar

  • Leave a Reply