The G-20 eyes financial inclusion using mobile phones, other ICTs

by Jim Rosenberg : Tuesday, March 9, 2010

To promote effective regulation of branchless banking, especially mobile banking, CGAP, DFID, and the Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI) have organized the third Global Leadership Seminar for high-level policymakers and regulators who set policy for branchless banking, including mobile banking. CGAP’s Technology Program and AFI are supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This week we’re blogging from the seminar.

Last fall, leaders of G-20 nations identified financial inclusion as a policy priority in a communiqué:

…we will launch a G-20 Financial Inclusion Experts Group. This group will identify lessons learned on innovative approaches to providing financial services to these groups, promote successful regulatory and policy approaches and elaborate standards on financial access, financial literacy, and consumer protection.

CGAP and AFI are working with the G-20 as it eyes increasing financial inclusion with information communication technology (ICT).  To dig deeper into this process and how it will be evaluated for success, I interviewed Paul Flanagan, co-chair of the G-20 Financial Inclusion Experts Group and General Manager, International Finance Division, Australian Treasury.

What is Australia’s interest in branchless banking and the G-20 agenda?
Australia’s interest in the Financial Inclusion Experts Group, and in particular the Access through Innovation Sub-Group, reflects Australia’s interest in ensuring the G-20 provides practical leadership on development related issues.  Korea has made it clear that development will be a major theme in the November Leader’s Summit, and our work will be an important part of this focus.  Australia is an active member of the G20 and is committed to supporting its work as the premier forum for international economic cooperation.

The G-20 commitment recognizes that around 2.5 billion adults around the world do not have access to formal or semi-formal financial services – nearly 90 per cent of whom live in Africa, Latin America, Asia and the Middle East.  Access to a wide set of financial tools, such as credit, savings products, payment services and insurance, provides poor people with much greater resilience to economic shocks, and increased capacity to increase or stabilize their income or build assets. The establishment of the Financial Inclusion Experts Group (FIEG), and its two sub-groups on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Finance, and Access through Innovation, recognized the mutually reinforcing policy objectives of financial stability, financial inclusion and consumer protection.

Australia has historically had a leadership role in East Asia and the Pacific when it comes to fighting poverty and promoting development.
In developing countries, nearly one billion people live on less than US$1 a day.  Two billion people have no access to clean water, while 150 million children never get the chance to go to school.  At least two thirds of these people live in the Asia Pacific region, the focus of Australia’s aid program.

We know of ANZ Bank rolling out mobile banking in PNG and Cambodia. What is it about branchless banking that you think would have high impact for vulnerable populations in the Pacific and East Asia?
With its highly dispersed populations, poor and ageing infrastructure and low levels of formal enterprise, the Pacific region has been very poorly served by financial services. Branchless banking offers new hope to the more than 80 per cent of Pacific Islanders currently without access to financial services of any kind.

In East Asia outreach to the poor is limited by these factors and by poorly targeted or outdated national regulation, low levels of financial literacy and a perception that providing services to the poor cannot be made commercially sustainable.

The Australian Government has supported ANZ’s WING projects in Cambodia, Papua New Guinea and in parts of the Pacific, and through these initiatives and others helped extend financial services to people living in rural and remote areas. Only through new technologies such as mobile phone banking can we hope to reach the most remote and most vulnerable people in these regions.

In development, the narrative for the past 60 years has been that the developing world can learn a lot from advanced economies. But when it comes to branchless banking, is it possible that this logic is reversed a bit?
Over my 32 years involvement in “development issues” my view has always been that people coming together and sharing experiences, of what has worked and what has not, is the essence of improving governance, institutions and capabilities.  Creating different categories, based on “developing” or “advanced” is a reflection of current states of development, not what people and countries can bring to discussions.  The lack of this distinction is one of the fundamental strengths of the G-20.  The G-20 FIEG Access through Innovation Sub-Group is developing principles based on the experience of leading countries in this field, regardless of where that leadership comes from. We are delighted to find that innovation in access to financial services is mostly coming from economies with lower GDP per capitas, but learning is never one-way. CGAP is doing a great job of facilitating an iterative learning process and AFI is conducting valuable peer-to-peer learning on these issues.

How might we measure success for the G-20 FIEG ATISG one year, or five years from now?
The work of the FIEG ATISG will have been a success if it provides the political catalyst for national level policy makers and regulators to increase financial inclusion though innovation. By the end of this year we are aiming to get G-20 leaders to endorse principles on increasing innovative access to financial services and an action plan to transform these principles into practice. We hope that national level policy makers and regulators make commitments to take action on implementing those principles.
In the medium-term, practical success will be seen where there are increasing numbers of rural and low income are included in the financial system thanks to the implementation of those principles. But it will not just be attributed to our work, but to each government, NGO, private business and the networks of each of those, that are working hard to achieve this goal.

-Paul Flanagan, as told to Jim Rosenberg

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

4 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. March 9th, 2010 at 9:59 am, Zeeshan ()

    Thanks for posting this, Jim.

    Your post has motivated me to learn more about branchless banking. What an interesting concept!

    Keep up the great work.

  • March 31st, 2010 at 9:25 am, Patrick ()

    Great share! Branchless banking especially mobile banking sounds really great. This is of the best things to happen in mobile phones if this project will be achieved.

  • May 10th, 2010 at 4:10 am, NP Mohapatra ()

    ROLE OF NABARD IN FINANCIAL INCLUSION

    Indian economy in general and banking services in particular have made rapid strides in the recent past. However, a sizeable section of the population, particularly the vulnerable groups, such as weaker sections and low income groups, continue to remain excluded from even the most basic opportunities and services provided by the financial sector. In order to address the issues of financial inclusion, the Government of India constituted a “Committee on Financial Inclusion” under the Chairmanship of Dr. C. Rangarajan. The Committee submitted its final report to Hon’ble Union Finance Minister on 04 January 2008.

    The Committee on Financial Inclusion has defined Financial Inclusion as “the process of ensuring access to financial services and timely and adequate credit where needed by vulnerable groups such as weaker sections and low income groups at an affordable cost.”

    Among other recommendations, the Committee has recommended setting up of two funds – Financial Inclusion Fund (FIF) and Financial Inclusion Technology Fund (FITF). The two funds have been established with NABARD which is the coordinating agency of Financial Inclusion initiatives with Financial Inclusion Department (FID) as the nodal department of NABARD.

    The core activities is to carry forward the agenda of financial inclusion of the excluded population at the national level as per the framework described by the Report of the Committee on Financial Inclusion in general and operationalising the Financial Inclusion Fund (FIF) and Financial Inclusion Technology Fund (FITF), in particular. The implementation is under the guidance of the two Advisory Boards set up for FIF and FITF respectively.

    The objectives of the two funds viz. FIF and FITF are:

    Objectives of FIF

    To support “developmental and promotional activities” with a view to securing greater financial inclusion, particularly among weaker sections, low income groups and in backward regions/ hitherto unbanked areas.

    Objectives of FITF

    To enhance investment in Information Communication Technology (ICT) aimed at promoting financial inclusion, stimulate the transfer of research and technology in financial inclusion, increase the technological absorption capacity of financial service providers/ users and encourage an environment of innovation and cooperation among stakeholders.

    Corpus and Sources of Funds

    Each of the Funds shall consist of an overall corpus of Rs. 500 crore, with initial funding to be contributed by the GoI, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and NABARD in a ratio of 40:40:20. The funding would be contributed in a phased manner over a maximum period of five years, depending upon utilisation of funds. As of now Government of India has contributed Rs. 10 crore and NABARD Rs. 5 crore for each of the two funds.

    Eligible Activities/ Purposes – FIF

    Funding support for capacity building inputs to Business Facilitators and Business Correspondents;
    Providing promotional support to institutions, such as, Resource Centres, Farmers’ Service Centres and Rural Development and Self Employment Training Institutes to enable them to provide improved technical and financial services (including counseling) aimed at increasing technology adoption, effective management of assets, nurturing entrepreneurial capacity and increasing financial education and literacy;
    Providing funding support for promotion, nurturing and credit linking of Self Help Groups (SHGs);
    Capacity building of personnel of NABARD, banks, Post Offices, State Government Departments, MFIs, NGOs, Local Level Associations, members of SHGs/ Joint Liability Groups, etc.;
    Defraying expenses of approved institutions for undertaking interventions for financial inclusion in Central, Eastern and NER Regions; J&K, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand;
    Funding support for setting up of Rural Credit Bureaus and credit rating of rural customers;
    Supporting initiatives of local level associations/ federations;
    Supporting pilot projects for development of innovative products, processes and prototypes for financial inclusion; and
    Any other developmental and promotional interventions recommended by the Advisory Board for the FIF.
    Eligible Activities/ Purposes – FITF

    Encouraging user friendly technology solutions;
    Providing financial support to technological solutions aimed at providing affordable financial services to the disadvantaged sections of the society;
    Creating a common technology infrastructure with comprehensive credit information;
    Funding support to technologies facilitating the documentation for processing of loans;
    Providing viability gap / pilot project funding for unproven but potential technological interventions;
    Conduct of studies, consultancies, research, evaluation studies relating to technological interventions for financial inclusion;
    Promoting seminars, conferences and other mechanisms for discussions, dissemination relating to financial inclusion technological interventions;
    Publication of financial inclusion technology literature, publicity material, etc.;
    Capacity building of personnel of banks, Post Offices, State Government Departments, MFIs, NGOs, VAs, other stakeholders; and
    Any other activity as may be approved by the Advisory Board.
    Eligible Institutions for FIF

    Financial Institutions, viz., NABARD, Commercial Banks, Regional Rural Banks and Cooperative Banks;
    NGOs, MFIs, SHGs, Farmers’ Clubs, Local Level Associations, etc.;
    Training and research organisations, academic institutions, universities;
    Service providers like Insurance Companies (providing micro insurance services), Post Offices, Railways, etc.;
    Any other organisation whose objectives are in conformity with the overall objectives of the FIF and are approved by the Advisory Board from time to time.
    Eligible Institutions for FITF

    Financial Institutions, viz., NABARD, Commercial Banks, Regional Rural Banks and Cooperative Banks;
    NGOs, MFIs, SHGs, Farmers’ Clubs, Local Level Associations, etc.;
    Technology Service providers and other service providers like Insurance Companies (providing micro insurance services), Post Offices, Railways, etc.;
    Any other institution/ organisation whose objectives are in conformity with the overall objectives of the FITF and are approved by the Advisory Board.

  • June 29th, 2010 at 9:21 am, Alex weir ()

    Making social payments which are targeted by category is vital. The system must allow funds to be restricted to agricultural inputs only or to food only or to medicines or school fees only. See cd3wd.Com/sps for details. Alex weir. Harare

  • Leave a Reply