A mobile wallet and the price of money

by Chris Bold : Thursday, February 4, 2010

easypaisaI would be pretty annoyed if my bank started to charge me for putting money in to my bank account. What strategy would CGAP’s partner in Pakistan, Tameer Microfinance Bank consider with their “mobile wallet”?  I spent a week in Pakistan with Ali Abbas Sikander and the Easypaisa team who have been thinking about their pricing strategy for the past three months.

EasyPaisa, a new brand of financial services offered by Telenor and Tameer, was launched on 14 October 2009 as an over-the-counter (OTC) bill payment service. A month later an OTC domestic money transfer product also became available. Both of these services are open to customers on any network as the agent carries out the transaction on her or his mobile phone. The “mobile wallet” will be available only to customers of Telenor (the MNO that has bought a majority stake in Tameer) who will be able to carry out bill payments, make money transfers and in the future access a whole range of financial services from their phone. Customers will have to visit an EasyPaisa agent to load up their mobile wallets or to make a withdrawal. Tameer and Telenor are considering whether to charge either a flat or a tiered-fee  to cash-in and cash-out to the wallet. Evidence from other countries suggests that customers will accept real negative interest rates to safely store their money , but being charged a fee to deposit their own money may prove to be a big a psychological barrier. Other services that have tried to charge a fee to cash-in (such as WIZZIT in South Africa) have struggled to build customer numbers.  How would the scenario be different with Easypaisa?

There are already some hints that customers value the convenience of EasyPaisa products enough to pay a premium for their use. In the first three months following the launch of EasyPaisa they have processed around 275,000 bill payments through their network of around 4,500 agents. For this service they charge a fee of Rs 10 – 25, (12 – 30 US cents) depending on the size of the bill. But Pakistani regulations ensure that the same bill can be paid for free at any commercial bank or through a network of government agents. So why would anyone chose to pay even a very small fee to process a bill?

There are a number of possible reasons for this. Firstly, agents tend to have longer opening hours than banks and government agents. Rs 10 might be a price you consider worth paying if it means that you don’t have to close your shop for two hours to wait in line at a bank. Secondly, banks are not very keen to attract such low margin business at their branches and long waiting times or just a lack of familiarity with banks may mean that customers may feel more comfortable at an EasyPaisa agent. Part of the reason for this may be related to their proximity to alterative service providers.

Telenor will pay commissions to their agents for loading up customers’ mobile wallets (and will want to ensure that agents receive commission for loading up a wallet as for processing an OTC transaction).  This will obviously push up the cost of the service. Research being conducted by CGAP’s Mark Pickens and Claudia Mackay which will soon be released looks set to show that some of the best known branchless banking services are actually more expensive than other alternatives available in the market. Customers it seems will pay for convenience, reliability and good quality services (haven’t we all at some point chosen to pay ATM fees when we can’t be bothered to walk to the nearest branch of our own bank?)
EasyPaisa has a lot of factors in its favor. The 2008 Branchless Banking Regulation  issued by State Bank of Pakistan has created possibly the most progressive regulatory environment in the world. And although attention is often focused on the enormous market in neighboring India, Pakistan’s population of 170 million makes it an attractive market (especially when you consider that 86% of Pakistanis do not have access to any form of formal financial services). But whether customers will pay cash-in fees is another question – and something that we will be watching carefully over the coming months if EasyPaisa does decide to charge.

-Chris Bold

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

4 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. February 4th, 2010 at 1:15 pm, Cecelia Tanaka ()

    The EasyPaisa account reminds me of a savings collection service I read in Portfolios of the Poor (http://portfoliosofthepoor.org/). Jyothi, a local entrepreneur, spent her days walking around her slum village in southern India collecting small deposits from her clients, the majority of whom were poor housewives. Clients committed themselves to saving in equal and regular installments, but at very small amounts. When clients reached 220 deposits, Jyothi returned the value of the savings less 20 deposits as a fee for her service. This method translated into Jyothi paying her customers a negative rate—though this did not deter new and repeat customers. The demand for this service generated two observations: 1) financial choices among the poor are based on more than price alone, even in the most limited budgets; and 2) safe and reliable financial services for poor households are scarce. New research on saving from the Financial Access Initiative (http://financialaccess.org/sites/default/files/HDE_6_Economics%20of%20saving.pdf) also sheds light on the tradeoffs in convenience, risk, price, and simplicity of financial tools available to the poor. The launch of EasyPaisa is an exciting step in increasing access to reliable financial instruments, and bringing these institutions to scale.

  • February 15th, 2010 at 6:01 am, Arsalan Mir ()

    I am Arsalan, Co-Editor at http://www.telecompk.net a leading blog about telecom industry in Pakistan.

    I am closely following the growth of mobile banking in Pakistan at my blog. The launch of the mobile wallet service was recently delayed for some reasons, of which I guess pricing strategy was also part of.

    Let me add a point here, in Pakistan a nominal cash withdrawal fee is charged, if cash is withdrawn from ATM machine of the bank you don’t hold and account in (ie withdrawing cash from other bank’s machine). Customers happily pay for this convenient, reliable service. So, in this case a small service fee should not be a concern for customers in case of mobile wallets.

    Your review of the service will be of keen interest for readers of my blog, if you allow I shall do a cross post of the this.

  • February 16th, 2010 at 9:19 am, Khurram Ali Khan ()

    I am a Microfinance Professional and Banker for more than eight years. I am currently workig as Manager Marketing for the largest MFB of Pakistan.

    Following is submitted on Chris Bold’s article on Telenor’s Easy Paisa in Pakistan.

    - I agree that, its an innovative Telco led model, although its way too early to guage success of the project.
    - Telenor has however spent more than billion to acquire an almost bankrupt MFB. So far the products and services they have launched could have been launched in collaborative arragemnts with commercial / microfinance Banks, even NGOs.
    - Where there are numerous advantages of buying a Bank, one huge disadvantage is compliance with the stringent regulatory requirements of SBP – a challenge Telenor would have to face in days to come. SBP might not allow certain products (particularly on liability side) due to security issues.
    - I agree that, as far as billing is concerned, there isnt enough value preposition for an ordinary Pakistani to spend 10-15 rupees.
    - The often quoted figure (less than 12% Pakistanis avail Banking services) needs to be reassessed. This mainly refers to account holders only. Those depositing a bill or availing over the counter services are not included in this.
    - Telenor’s model will be successful in long run only, if a variety of services are offered to clients, network is expaded, and if most services are available on the click of the button.
    - Sooner or later Telonor would have t enter into arrangements with other banks as well, in order to be able to tap thier clientale as well.

    Regards,

    Khurram Ali Khan

  • March 31st, 2010 at 7:54 am, Touqeer ()

    Well, An Accountant here!

    Telenor have 51% shares of Tameer Bank. if any other bank will try to deal with Telenor, first of all they shall concerned or make sure from their committed documents.

    In future it is nor easy to committed with another party!

    And their is no any bank who will give 51 % more shares for a tele-come company for business, cuz telenor do’t wants. i think 51 % shares are enough for Publicity; for business. what you think?

  • Leave a Reply