Post your questions – how a younger world, the internet, security, and activist governments will shape financial inclusion in 2020

by Jim Rosenberg : Monday, November 30, 2009

6 months + 200 technology and finance leaders from 30 countries = four scenarios of branchless banking for poor people in 2020.

CGAP and DFID invite you to a special webcast discussion of the CGAP/DFID Branchless Banking Scenarios 2020 Project and Focus Note.

The event was webcast live on the CGAP Technology Blog starting at 3pm ET (20:00 GMT) on December 1, 2009.

Watch the video – Branchless Banking Scenarios for 2020




Snapshot of branchless banking today

  • Financial inclusion is growing in most countries. This is often as a result of the expansion of conventional banking channels, such as branches and automated teller machines (ATMs);
  • Bricks-and-mortar growth is inherently limited by its cost. Branchless banking presents a cheaper option but has only modest reach to date in most countries;
  • Where branchless banking is occurring, several of the following factors are usually at work: (i) industry belief in future profitability; (ii) enabling regulatory change; (iii) a dramatic fall in connectivity costs; (iv) the creation of cash-handling agents using existing networks; and,
  • Current hype about the potential of branchless banking is running ahead of reality. Massive sustained success in reaching the poor requires more accurate insights on poor people’s financial needs and adoption behaviour. This is only now starting to become available.

Four Forces Shaping Branchless Banking for 2020

  • Demographic changes—including a greater number of younger consumers coming into the market and greater mobility at least within countries—will be favourable for the adoption of branchless banking;
  • Activist governments will play a greater role as regulators of the financial sector, providers of social safety nets, and providers or encouragers of the rollout of low-cost bank accounts and financial infrastructure. This expanded role may be helpful for financial inclusion;
  • While security concerns about cash crime will continue to drive the adoption of electronic transaction channels, the rise of electronic crime will affect consumer confidence and test the risk management of financial providers; and,
  • Internet browsing via mobile phones will reduce costs of financial transactions and enable new players to offer financial services.

Speakers include:

The driving question that the scenarios project has sought to answer is: “How can government and private sector most affect the uptake and use of branchless banking among the un-served majority by 2020?”


-Jim Rosenberg

TAGS: CGAP, Events, Policy

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

5 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. November 30th, 2009 at 9:09 pm, Bruce Burke ()

    Government and private sector can help implement regulation that requires carriers to make all numbers portable. As well all applicable carriers should be required to participate in the GSMA PathFinder (ENUM) service. These are underlying framework that allows complete end to end verification of messages from one mobile phone to the other any where in the world. Building the basic foundation and laying the groundwork is a requirement to enable adoption. Then allow innovators to build on this framework and develop all new ideas and systems that change and grow groups. A dominant standard will emerge.

  • November 30th, 2009 at 11:41 pm, Vijay Pratap Singh Aditya ()

    Younger world means more attraction and openness for adoption of technology enabled financial services. While technology solutions are available policy and institutional frameworks governing financial inclusion are redundant and obsolete. This is an area where work needs to be done by international agency to educate governance systems in developing countries.

  • December 1st, 2009 at 8:41 am, Jose Anson ()

    One of the most important issues in branchless banking is to align the interests of the poor, the agent and the bank (or financial partner). So far, discussions have focused on the principal-agent relationship between the agent and the bank, that is a one-sided agent model. Achieving sustainable financial inclusion may require a two-sided – or multi-sided – agent approach, with the same agent not only acting for a bank but also for a group of low-income people, and by so-doing better aligning the various parties’ interests. Do such agents exist? I think so: some agents may enjoy the trust of the poor, be very close to them, offer affordable services while simultaneously benefiting from a joint-venture with one or several banks (or other financial entities) and deliver many activists governments’ benefits. One of these multi-sided agents is called the post office, with three striking cases in Brazil, India and China. So why don’t we pay more attention to multi-sided agents that can better internalize and align the interests of different parties?

  • December 1st, 2009 at 10:28 am, Branchless banking scenarios 2020: CGAP invites us to debate « Postal Financial Inclusion ()

    [...] us to debate Today, CGAP invites us to debate the 2020 branchless banking scenarios in their technology blog. We submitted the following question, maybe you also have your opinion. So post here or [...]

  • December 1st, 2009 at 2:27 pm, Gail Simpson Ruiz ()

    Good Afternoon,
    There is a significant portion of the population in South America that does not have access to banking. What possibilities does mobile banking have in South America, particularly Colombia?
    Thanks, Gail Simpson

  • Leave a Reply