Some data on what M-PESA users want – and need

by Mark Pickens : Monday, October 5, 2009

We don’t know half as much as we’d like to about how poor people use and perceive branchless banking. But more data is giving us progressively better insights. A survey in Kenya, funded by FSD Kenya, provides a window onto M-PESA. The survey was done with 3,000 randomly selected households (with a bias towards locations with more M-PESA agents, so its not nationally representative and probably undercounts what’s happening in more remote, poorer areas of the country).

The highlights confirm some of what we already thought was happening, but also points at several surprises.

While M-PESA is wildly popular (85% of users say they are “happy”, “very happy” or “extremely happy” with the service), 85% use it once a month or even less frequently. In other words, they love it, but use it mostly for money transfer, a transaction most Kenyans only need to do infrequently. This suggests M-PESA still has a long way to go to penetrate other parts of Kenyan’s financial lives.

However, that seems to be happening already with a larger-than-expected cohort. Far more Kenyans are storing money in their M-PESA wallet than we thought. 21% said they use it to store money, typically for emergencies or short term needs.

Another interesting finding: 20% of users report having encountered problems withdrawing money from an M-PESA agent, usually because the agent does not have cash on hand. This is fascinating: could a bank survive if 1 in 5 of its customers couldn’t get their money when they wanted? Undoubtedly not.

But the super high satisfaction levels with M-PESA suggest consumers are more willing to put up with a degree of faults and limits with M-PESA, likely because customers have different (i.e. lower) expectations for a money transfer service than a bank. Perhaps M-PESA is such an improvement on the alternatives that the net gain in usability, security and affordability makes the occasional inconvenience with agents worth bearing.

The data also indicates customers typically put up with problems — only 1 in 4 who said they had a problem have attempted to report it to Safaricom. 93% of users say they don’t know how to complain to Safaricom. More than likely, they’re asking agents for help. In other words, agents are not only the #1 source of complaints (can’t get my cash) but also the place customers turn to for help.

-Mark Pickens

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

4 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. October 6th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, Tim Mukata ()

    Very good review.

  • October 6th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, Kazeem ()

    A great exercise. Thanks for sharing the result

  • November 3rd, 2009 at 4:04 pm, Paul ()

    Mark – thanks for this.

    It’s great to see data coming in on use. In the future I’m looking forward to learning more about the limitations of the system (can’t always get money when you want it and other problems) versus Kenyan society’s cultural context. At the moment it sounds like the current system is more than adequate to respond to societal demand.

    That said, what would have to happen in society to drive more people to a system? And what can the system do to attract more users (will improving agents’ access to cash attract new users, for instance, or is that irrelevant)?

  • November 21st, 2009 at 3:24 am, MERCY ADHOLA ()

    the data has been of help as iam doing a reserch on the problems agents and customers of mobile banking face while transacting.

  • Leave a Reply