Mobile Banking in Tanzania: Concluding Thoughts

by Sarah Rotman: Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Over the last few weeks on this blog, we’ve looked at M-PESA in Kenya and Tanzania (read more about this comparison at www.cgap.org/technology), Zain’s Zap product that recently launched in Tanzania, and Zantel’s launch of Z-PESA. Here are some of my concluding thoughts on mobile banking in Tanzania.

With the success of mobile banking in neighboring Kenya, many people assume that similar success would be quick to arrive in Tanzania. And indeed there are many important lessons from Safaricom’s implementation of M-PESA in Kenya for m-banking launches all over the world. Marketing must be clear and simple, targeted at the common citizen’s need for a specific service. A strategic commitment from the entire company and the specific m-banking team must be strong. A willingness to make considerable investments, such as SIM swaps, must be present. And somehow Kenya was able to get agent acquisition to an auto-catalytic level.

Yet the mobile banking landscape in Tanzania is quite different from that of Kenya and must be adjusted accordingly. In some ways, we already see that happening in a form of “m-banking 2.0” emerging.

  1. Zain recognized the need to pay commissions to agents much quicker than Safaricom has done in Kenya. In fact, their business model is such that agents receive commissions immediately. In response, Vodacom has also restructured its commission payments so that agents receive commissions directly into their float account.
  2. Zain created a richer product proposition than simply “send money home” like that of M-PESA Kenya. In addition to remittances, Zap is focused on micropayments and business to business transactions. This makes it attractive to banked and unbanked customers alike.
  3. Zantel and Vodacom realized that initial float accounts can prove an obstacle for agents to begin offering Z-PESA or M-PESA. They are both considering financing to help these agents get started.
  4. Finally, pricing has been approached differently in Tanzania, both by Zain which allows customers to negotiate directly with agents and by Vodacom which has created a more segmented price scale for transaction amounts, making it more affordable for customer to send small amounts of money.

Perhaps Kenya is more of the exception than the rule to always be followed. While there are many good lessons to be learned from the Kenyan experience, it may not always be possible to carbon copy it anywhere in the world.

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

3 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. August 19th, 2009 at 7:05 pm, links for 2009-08-19 « Brandopia ()

    [...] Mobile Banking in Tanzania: Concluding Thoughts Some pretty cool examples of Mobile Banking in Africa. (tags: Mobile Banking payment) [...]

  2. August 21st, 2009 at 12:54 am, Arun ()

    Is there any study done on whether the current mobile payment systems in Tanzania provide for an agent to conspire with customers to conduct multiple transactions purely to gain commissions where the commissions are attractive enough to off-set fees charged to customers for such transactions?

    Revenue leakage, fraud and other control weaknesses will lead to the exploitation of such business models.

    All study conducted so far has been focussed only on the business model. It would really help even if a periodic analysis of risks are reported so that better controls can be designed, implemented and tested where all parties to the business are comfortable and no one takes the entire brunt of any untoward incident in the system.

  3. June 8th, 2010 at 6:05 am, John Hurley ()

    I think it is important to make the distinction between “Mobile Banking” and “Mobile Payment” systems (such as M-Pesa and ZAP). Mobile Banking extends the reach of banking services to those who already have bank accounts. (It obviates the need to travel to branches or to get internet access to conduct banking transactions).

    Mobile payment systems also have those benefits but extend the reach of mobile payment and transfers to members of the population who do not have bank accounts.
    Banks who do not establish a presence in mobile banking should not be surprised if the general population adopts alternative mechanisms for conducting their financial transactions. Mobile banking provides them an opportunity to extend the geographic reach of their services, which could provide them with huge growth in business, if they take it up.

Leave a Reply