Mobile Banking in Tanzania: Can Kenya’s success be replicated next door?
by Sarah Rotman : Tuesday, July 21, 2009
No one who is a regular reader of this blog needs an introduction to M-PESA in Kenya. But some of you may not know that M-PESA launched next door in Tanzania over a year ago. Haven’t heard much about it, have you? That’s probably because unlike the rapid uptake and quick agent network that developed in Kenya, things have moved much slower for Vodacom’s M-PESA product in Tanzania.
We have just posted a web story analyzing the differences between these two implementations. To entice you to read more, here are a few of our observations.
1. Geography and culture: Tanzania is a much more spread out and less densely populated country than Kenya. This may seem trivial until you remember that the density of one’s agent network is a key factor to any m-payments product.
2. Market and competition: Safaricom in Kenya has 79% market share with 12.5 million clients. Vodacom in Tanzania has 41% market share with 5.2 million subscribers. And Zain, Tigo and Zantel are gaining ground every day.
3. Agent networks: It appears that Vodacom has less direct control and influence on its airtime distribution channel than Safaricom. Vodacom works directly with six airtime wholesalers, compared with 300 that Safaricom works with. And as you know from the experience in Kenya, Safaricom’s airtime distribution network was a key element in the rapid development of the M-PESA agent network.
4. Marketing and strategy: Initial Vodacom M-PESA marketing didn’t make the easy “send money home” message that Safaricom was so successful at. As a result, customers were unsure of what the product offered them and if it was really geared at the average Tanzanian.
Read more about this comparison at www.cgap.org/technology.
July 23rd, 2009 at 12:41 am, Upendra Namburi ()
A business model performance needs to be evaluated from two perspectives
1. Country Development Indicators : Banking penetration etc &
2. The Organisaiton Resources : Share, customer base etc.
Vodafone/Safaricom they may like to look at the following variables as well when entering new markets:
a. Distribution alliances with other industries, who offer the optimal reach
b. Alliances with other mobile operators as well!
c. Value Proposition : The value proposition for traders may be different from consumers ( non earning members).
Upendra


8 Comments
July 22nd, 2009 at 1:56 pm, thadk ()
Also it seems Vodacom has recently, essentially thrown in the towel: event:http://bit.ly/dDAI5
It has certainly felt that way for a while. Zain owns the market and innovates as a slow incumbent for most of the country, Tigo & Zantel are breaking ground but can’t match certain offers (like unlimited texts) due to penetration. Too early to see if Zain’s Zap will work. One funny is that they have a money transfer form in our market-place Zain kiosk, which, in lieu of a formal ID, you can simply get the village leader’s signature.