What you don’t know about M-PESA

by Olga Morawczynski : Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Olga Morawczynski is a doctoral candidate at the University of Edinburgh and has spent more than a year investigating customer adoption and usage in both urban and rural Kenya.  She is the author of a forthcoming CGAP brief on M-PESA and recently co-authored Designing Mobile Money Services:  Lessons from M-PESA with Ignacio Mas.

The story of M-PESA that most of us know usually goes as follows.  The two big players, Vodafone and Safaricom, got together to develop and launch M-PESA. They spent months testing, adjusting, and re-testing the system before it went live. The result—an immensely popular service offering that has radically changed both the financial and telecommunications sectors in developing countries and spawned a lucrative industry for mobile money.  This is not exactly how the story went, at least not in the early days. Vodafone, led by a powerful duo of Nick Hughes and Susie Lonie, was heavily involved from the beginning. While Nick was selling the service idea to the executive staff at Vodafone, Susie was getting her hands dirty, so to speak, and leading the pilot in Kenya.

Although Safaricom provided support throughout the pilot (access to desk space, a small customer care and finance team, technical integration and support) they did not dedicate a larger team to the project until commercial launch.  This is not surprising. The mobile network operator (MNO) was still focused on growing their customer base. The introduction of a service that radically differed from their core service offering was risky. Many also questioned whether M-PESA could beat out a form of value transfer that was already in place—airtime.

So, if Safaricom was not heavily involved in the pilot then who was?  There was also a smaller player that had a vitally important role in the conceptualization and development of the application. That is, Sagentia, a technology consultancy firm based out of Cambridge. The firm not only wrote the software for M-PESA, they also designed the business processes, and provided operational and technical support during the pilot and after launch.

Recently, I was lucky to meet the initial development team of Sagentia (now they have formed their own company called Iceni Mobile) at their offices just outside of Cambridge. Several interesting findings came out of this discussion. Firstly, the firm emphasized that a small and dedicated team is important, especially when two big players are working together. M-PESA needed a significant amount of attention from the beginning. The demand for such attention increased as M-PESA grew rapidly—surpassing 2 million customers within their first year. Members of the team told stories of being on-call 24/7, and resolving system issues in the middle of the night. There is no doubt that it would have been difficult to get such attention from either of the MNO giants. Usually, these companies lack the resources (human, time) that are needed for the development of this type of system. This is especially the case if the product has not yet gained the confidence of those at the very top.
Furthermore, the design of the application interface and entire system underwent several iterations. It began as a tool for the repayment of MFI loans. It was launched as a P2P transfer service. Such changes were made because the pilot team did their research, and closely monitored usage patterns. Their findings in the field were then fed back into the design of the application. The team explained that to react to these changes, they focused on flexible design. This has paid off generously as M-PESA moves across other contexts, which have very different needs and usage patterns.
I ended the discussion by asking the team what they planned to focus on next. How do you, after all, beat a success like M-PESA? They assured me that M-PESA was just the beginning. Using the mobile as a platform, they plan to create developmental services that penetrate other spheres —m-health, agribusiness. They further predicted that the mobile will soon begin to revolutionize these other spaces as well. This is a very exciting proposition. If the mobile phone can penetrate and transform financial sector, which is dominated by old and powerful players, imagine what it can do in these other spaces.

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

  • July 15th, 2009 at 3:32 am, Mauri Yambo ()

    Your saying that “Safaricom was not heavily involved in the [M-pesa]pilot” — when, clearly, the pilot would never have been possible without Safaricom’s network [of technology and people (ordinary Kenyans)] — reminds me of a Tweet some 2-3 months ago which claimed that M-pesa’s success was (solely?) thanks to a grant of some 2 million British Pounds from DFID. How many DFID grants have gone down the drain?

    That particular grant would have had no effect were Safaricom not already succeeding on the ground with its mobile phone service. And Safaricom would not have been succeeding already were it not for millions of Kenyans who took to it as the answer to the technical and bureaucratic tyranny of the then fixed-line, monopoly operator.

    To me, the most important passage in the above narrative is this:”Furthermore, the design of the application interface and entire system underwent several iterations. It began as a tool for the repayment of MFI loans. It was launched as a P2P transfer service. Such changes were made because the pilot team did their research, and closely monitored usage patterns. Their findings in the field were then fed back into the design of the application.” That passage underscores the rather obvious fact that the M-pesa service as rolled out reflects ordinary (“unbanked”) Kenyans’ expressed preferences in the use of mobile telephony — not to pay debts but to meet social capital obligations and other reciprocal duties and responsibilities.

    Ordinary Kenyans were an integral partner in the initial success of M-pesa, and cotinue to power its growth. Some credit to them, please.

  • July 15th, 2009 at 9:40 am, Heather Ritter ()

    I am not surprised that Safaricom was concerned about airtime. It is probably one of the main reasons that M-PESA is not doing well in Tanzania. It is good that they took a chance to let M-PESA be introduced into the market. This really was risky.

  • July 15th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, M-PESA Fan ()

    To Mauri Yambo –

    The article is not at all trying to discredit Safaricom – of course their input was vital, as was that of the Vodafone team. Rather Olga is trying to highlight that there was a background player that not many people knew about, helping fit the pieces of the money transfer puzzle together. It was of course ordinary Kenyans (with their willingness to embrace new technology) that they were learning from along the way! M-PESA launched 2.5 years ago, but there was another 2 years before that of development, trialling, investigation and change before that launch was possible. There is no way that M-PESA would have taken off without Safaricom’s involvement and immense support at all levels (as well as the fantastic people of Kenya getting behind it), but Olga is simply raising the point that without others supporting the project behind the scenes in the early days, Safaricom may not have taken the risk at the expense of their core (very successful) telecoms business which was clearly their key focus…

  • July 17th, 2009 at 3:53 am, Olga Morawczynski ()

    Hello Mauri Yambo,

    Thanks for your comment. M-PESA fan is right. I never meant to discredit the role of Safaricom, and there is no way that the pilot would have gone live without their support. However, they were not the key drivers during the conceptualization and design stage. This is where Sagentia and Vodafone played a vital role.

    But Safaricom did have an important role to play in the growth of M-PESA, albeit at a later stage. After a dedicated team was assigned at launch, Safaricom really invested time and energy into the growth of M-PESA. They cultivated a brilliant marketing campaign (send money home) and worked on growing the partnership base (paynet, unchumi) . However, i want to emphasize again that it was not until launch that Safaricom became the key driver in the development of M-PESA.

    Also, the DFID grant was not given to Safaricom. It was given to Nick Hughes of Vodafone. He then made contact with Safaricom to initiate the pilot.

    Many thanks for the feedback.

  • July 17th, 2009 at 6:07 am, Andrea Bohnstedt ()

    What, Safaricom didn’t hand-knit MPESA?? Outsourcing exists …?

  • July 19th, 2009 at 7:07 am, Jaclyn Taylor-MSFI ()

    Probably because there was not much in the market when they launched the service…Now we see many more of these outsourced services because as the author said, a whole new industry has grown after the success of Mpesa.

  • August 3rd, 2009 at 9:42 am, Putting People First in italiano » Quel che non sapete su M-PESA ()

    [...] Leggi l’articolo [...]

  • September 17th, 2009 at 9:45 am, Karanja George ()

    Interesting angle to the whole story but may be Olga should also explored the angle of local investors who went to court claiming that safaricom had stolen their Idea. The story in itself is revealing of the behind the scene players who were involved in the design.

  • September 17th, 2009 at 10:15 am, David ()

    I have used M-Pesa since its launch and I have been lucky to have used it in two different countries with totally different success stories. While M-Pesa has been a great success in Kenya, the story is totally different in Tanzania, where Vodacom has barely got M-Pesa off the ground. So, I go back to saying what Mauri has said, that yes, Safaricom was a major player and so were the receptive people of Kenya. Tanzania is just a next door neighbor and M-Pesa is failing miserably there at least compared to the growth it saw in Kenya. The other players did a great role in the product but Safaricom is a HUGE player in my view.

  • September 17th, 2009 at 10:32 pm, Majibu.com | Africa in Technology, Mobile, Software, Internet, Blogging, Media and Web» Blog Archive » Attempts to Write-off Africa at Our Achievements ()

    [...] page at CGAP gives a 404 page maybe for a good reason)  which he wrote for CGAP trying to tell us what we don’t know about M-Pesa, Kenya’s mobile money transfer. I feel obliged to say that his research (If any) is biased. [...]

  • October 5th, 2009 at 5:29 am, ruralfreak ()

    Very interested by your article, thank you.
    Tell me, 2 questions:
    Is illiteracy a barrier to use M-PESA services? If not, how is it handled?
    Who are M-PESA agents in rural areas? Are there places where it is difficult to find reliable agents?
    Thank you

  • October 6th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, Tim Mukata ()

    That small team of Finance, Customer Care, Integrators etc guided Susie Lonie to actually get it right…long before launch. Take note that the first business model the Susie brought – the MFI model, actually flopped when put to real test on the ground.

    Those mentioned re-engineerings, resulting in the launch as a P2P service was a design bred out of the local professional input, and the local market.

    And these guys also spent 24×7 hours, not only the Sagentia guys. And they brought in design ideas on the hows and the whys. And they designed the business processes which Sagentia mirrored in the form of system processes.

    Put another way, were it not for these specific inputs, the MPESA model courtesy of Susie and Sagentia was a cropper. Plain and simple.

  • October 7th, 2009 at 3:42 am, Peter Wanyonyi ()

    @Mukata: Susie’s model was not “a flop” – it provided the infrastructure, the backbone, the basis for the eventual take-off of M-PESA in its current form. Recall that, prior to Susie, this application of mobile money had simply not been implemented – even thought of – elsewhere, nor by anyone else as far as one can tell. As is noted, the very same model currently wildly successful in Kenya is yet to catch on in Tanzania – perhaps a result of the slight differences in implementation, or the prevailing economic environment there, or whatever. It is noteworthy that, from her research, Susie thought M-PESA would work in Kenya. Without this initial spur, the service would probably not exist as we know it. Technologies are sometimes applied to uses not initially intended for them: this is the basis of progress, innovation and adaptation that allows societies to move forward.

  • October 12th, 2009 at 8:02 am, M-PESA Fan ()

    P2P Money transfer was a facility available to customer on Day 1 of the M-PESA pilot – so the pilot was most certainly not a flop! It was not re-engineered technically as a result of the trial; rather the marketing campaign at launch used the learnings to make P2P transfer the fore-runner, and to downgrade the MFI emphasis. These days you can see Pay Bill on the phone just as prominently as Pay MFI was in the pilot days. The simplification for launch was about streamlining the customer message more than anything else.

  • December 18th, 2009 at 3:57 am, Sulah Ndaula ()

    Everything said, Olga did her piece in enhancing the M-Money practice and body of knowledge. What I see many of us say, is that Olga must have covered everything and that she must have worn all the lenses of seeing things – that never happens in life, she had to have an angle, ours shld only be suggestions for further studies.

  • December 22nd, 2009 at 5:26 pm, gmeltdown ()

    You cannot divorce the M-PESA story from the patriotic emotion of Kenyans

  • January 26th, 2010 at 6:21 am, Michael Uiari ()

    “Many also questioned whether M-PESA could beat out a form of value transfer that was already in place—airtime.”

    I would like to explore this issue and would be grateful for you all to provide your insights and suggestions and for the author to share her insight on this issue.

    If the transfer of value is already posssible through P2P airtime transfers, which could lead to an informal network that operates similarly to a m money service, how does a m money service displace a pre-existing informal method of transferring value to be utilised in the same way – to withdraw cash, buy goods and pay for services using airtime.

  • March 12th, 2010 at 6:44 am, George Kinyanjui ()

    Hi Olga and Ignacio,
    I am also a doctoral candidate. I would like to share the MFI loan repayment side of Mpesa which as you correctly put was the original idea. I have for the last two and a half years undertaken a pilot and consequently rolled out for a micro finance institution in Kenya. It has been a healthy learning experience.

  • March 31st, 2010 at 6:09 am, Paul ()

    From a Business information Systems POV Olga has done a great job.She has expounded on the infamous SDLC which any system undergoes,some see it only from a Maintenance point of view, which should be the view of the normal M-pesa user,anyone in the academic world knows how much the word :source: means to a concept.I for one didnt know about Sagentia

  • July 3rd, 2010 at 2:58 am, Bern ()

    @ Rural freak, If illetracy is a barrier it is very minimal. M-pesa agents are business people who register with Safaricom to offer the services of M-pesa. That explains that they will only operate in places they profitably serve. Thats why some banks have partnered with it to offers cash any time.

  • March 10th, 2011 at 7:05 am, maze ()

    Olga, The success of M-PESA was not hinged on the development of the code and “business processes”. Some of us had already developed software that could do exactly what M-PESA does before it was launched while still in University. The success of the product arose from the distribution channels built by the Commercial department in Safaricom. The agencies and business partners were the key. For your information, one of Safaricom’s rivals in Kenya launched a money transfer service BEFORE M-PESA was launched, yet it floundered due to the lack of a distribution network.

  • Leave a Reply