Mobile banking in India - hyped or popular? Questions for Vodafone’s Naushad Contractor

by Jim Rosenberg: Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Recently we spoke with Naushad Contractor about India’s mobile banking trends. A payments professional with over 12 years experience across geographies, Naushad heads marketing for mobile commerce at Vodafone Essar ltd., India. He is also on the regulatory committee of the Mobile Payments Forum of India.

Part of e-Businesses success stories, he has played a key role in launching India’s first eWallet and was a member of the core team that launched and made Remit2India.com the World’s No.1 Independent Money Transfer Portal for Non Resident Indians.

Q: Is mobile banking popular or hyped?
I think Mobile Banking is increasingly becoming popular but it is much more hyped than it is popular. Everyone says “I Do” but actually not many actually do as they say. However, the factor of sheer convenience for the customer and lower transaction costs for the banks is creating a conducive pull + push environment for increasing understanding and usage of this relatively new concept. As in the early days of internet banking, most people will tend to use mobile banking just as an information tool rather than conducting too many transactions on the mobile. Even the initial transactions will be much lower in value. Once trust in mobile banking increases as a result of good user experience, both usage and transaction values will begin to normalize.



Q: With regard to this sort of product, what is driving change in India?

A large unbanked population coupled with acceptability of the medium and deeper and wider reach of mobile phones makes India so conducive for mobile banking and payments. A crying need for basic financial services and remittance channels catalyzed by an amazingly fast growing mobile subscriber base will force necessary changes to make such services more widely available. It is only a matter of time before such services become the primary channel for reaching financial services to the unbanked both in rural and urban areas.

Q: What are some of the more difficult challenges you see for reaching people in poor, remote areas?
It may sound clichéd but one of the important challenges is being able to reach and serve the poor profitably. What’s key is offering enough value to agents and other channel partners while making enough money at a convenient and affordable end price to the customer. The need, propensity & more importantly the ability to save are other factors that will play a role once we have reached these financially excluded people. Low education levels, lack of trust in other people and language barriers further increase difficulty levels in reaching out to the poor in remote areas.


Q: Banks have been struggling with that for decades; why do you think mobile operators can make it happen?

From the customer’s viewpoint, mobile phones in the last 10 -12 years have reached far more people than banking has. As per a recent BCG report, there are 26 million households in the country who have a mobile phone but no access to basic banking and financial services. The mobile phone as a medium of information and transactions is trusted and accepted by a very large section of society in a very short time span.

From the service provider’s viewpoint, the key differentiator for this relatively higher penetration and widespread acceptance is the willing and able distribution network that telcos have successfully set up. They almost bring the service to the customer’s doorstep. Not leveraging this strength and not synergizing the same with the banking system is probably the single largest factor for slower financial inclusion in the country.

Q: What is the mindset shift that would need to happen for banks to be able to work by themselves or with mobile operators to reach the unbanked?
Banking the unbanked is one of the key directives issued to commercial banks by the Central bank. The progressive Commercial Banks have understood the concept and benefit of using mobile technology to make its efforts for financial inclusion more efficient and effective. More importantly mindset changes are required at the central bank level in order to allow banks to freely work with telecom operators. Many of the fears may be well placed, but in the interest of better Financial Inclusion, it is the need of the hour to use the concept of proportionality for smaller value transactions to counter such fears.

Q: What will we be talking about or worried about five years from now?
Five years is a very long time for the amazingly dynamic world of mobile technology which will be used in mobile banking & payments. I think there will suddenly emerge a few disruptive solutions to the many small problems we are unable to fix today.

However, if I am forced to hazard a guess, I would say we would be talking about how the mobile phone has revolutionized the country for a second time, and this time in the sphere of getting more and more people into the fold of financial services. I believe this even though the current trend of regulation in India that is NOT favourable for leveraging the strengths of the telecom industry to hasten Financial Inclusion and make it more affordable, profitable and efficient. Optimism and realism both lead me to believe that these are minor hiccups and sheer need and public interest will finally help resolve them much faster. The debate on mobile banking and Financial Inclusion with Telecom Companies playing a more active participative role would be over due to its huge success.

Comments: Comments and trackbacks are open.

6 Comments RSS 2.0

  1. October 21st, 2008 at 8:57 pm, panganai Sharawakanda ()

    Remit2Africa.com????does that exist. l have seen major banks enter the mobile banking space in India with proprietary systems, such as Barclays recent launch. the trend is similar in Africa, where l count at least 4 independent mobile banking platforms which are sure to be put out of business should all banks launch their own mobile banking platform. In any case they will need to do so to protect their market.

    l raise my question as a technology marketing expert that we now need an open standard, like a switching environment to connect all banks and service providers, much like an ATM. this called working smart and everyone does not go reinventing the wheel. they merely plug and play their mobile banking platform.
    Again the need to be organised is at the cost of individual benefit. Here agin is my request and perhaps your opinion would help. If we get a hub that can connect all banks and service providers including mobile network operators, we begin to work backwards cascading the interconnection.
    l am in the middle of a project that requires one such solution. What advise can you give me in rolling this out. One recent technology we have been utilising on the ground for market uptake is Bluetooth Proximity Marketing to advertise and to push the application to devices. You should see the response outside a bank where everyone is in a que going round the block for one ATM. The Bluetooth message comes through and one person tells the next…..If only we can get the network to work

    Panganai
    Director Business Dev
    SIH Mobile Banking Services
    Southern Africa
    +27 76 768 7176

  2. October 24th, 2008 at 1:01 am, TECHNOLOGY FOCUS: Mobile Banking in India - hyped or popular? A CGAP Interview ()

    [...] the Poor (CGAP), the leading microfinance think tank housed at the World Bank, recently posted and interview with with Naushad Contractor about India’s mobile banking trends in their technology blog. [...]

  3. October 24th, 2008 at 7:40 am, M-banking en India « Telefonía Móvil y Acceso a Servicios Financieros en América Latina y Caribe ()

    [...] tendencias de la banca celular en India, Jim Rosenberg publica en el blog de CGAP una interesante entrevista (en inglés) a Naushad Contractor, Director de Marketing para comercio móvil en Vodafone Essar y miembro del comité regulatorio del [...]

  4. November 20th, 2008 at 6:00 am, Prateek Shrivastava ()

    In response to Panganai’s comment. I completely agree with your thought and this is what we do at Monitise. We have built hubs in the UK and the US that allow banks and operators to talk together and deploy products and services that are meaningful to them and their customers.

    We have successfully driven the cost of deployment of mobile-banking down for banks and operators. This makes it a better proposition for the consumer.

  5. April 20th, 2009 at 10:06 pm, CK ()

    The question is WHY do we need the banks ? Why do we need to use the banks to transfer funds between their accounts when we know the exorbitant costs and lack of physical access for unbanked users. Imagine if all the telco’s networks are connected then electronic currency will need not be cashed out, hence at least 70 % of the population can pay anyone on any network without the need to ask for real cash (which is the real issue - See M-Pesa problem with agents having to horde cash and recieve cash -). No physical cash equals no banks and with no banks, less costs and faster deployment.

  6. January 25th, 2010 at 6:04 pm, panganai Sharawakanda ()

    Having recently acquired a mobile banking licence and rolling ou the business in Africa has been interesting. The regulator seeks to protect the interest of certain institutions that would rather have customers que up to collect cash from an ATM that is down half the time. The rationale is to keep a flow of transactions and fees going. This can be done with mobile banking but not as effectly. Less fees. Not so, there are so may services that can be launched on a mobile banking platform. Finally the banks catch on and they are launching their own inhouse mobile banking platforms as predicted. Only problem is that this is not their core business and the result is poor deployment, poor customer service. All in the name of controlling and owning the customer. This is at the detriment od the customer.
    South Africa: mobile banking has taken off very slowely due to “good infrastructure” NOT. Its about the battle between the mobile operator and the network operator. Fortunately or not, in South Africa the regulatory requirements are more strict on deposit taking institutions such as mobile banking platforms. Again this protects the bank and not the customer.
    It is slow in coming, perhaps not as popular as in Kenya Safaricom MPesa.
    The quetion is if mobile banking has died before it took off? What really is the business model? and is this model sustainable to build a business case where people traditionally like the sound of the ATM and the feel of cash in their hands. Remains to be seen.
    Panganai Sharawakanda

Leave a Reply