That was fun. What did we learn? 

We reaffirmed that small, including micro, enterprises have proven themselves to be reliable and sustainable ways to help people out of poverty and that, in that context, we have abundant proof that microfinance is a workable idea.

MFIs, although having reached increasingly impressive numbers of people, must nonetheless recognize that more than two-thirds of the inhabitants of developing countries remain to be touched by the MFI mission of bringing the advantages of banking to the unbanked and under-banked.

Both the time and the opportunity have arrived for MFIs to rethink their original ethic of experimentation, labor intensiveness and small scale and to extend access to finance to as many as possible of the 2.5 billion who lack access to finance.

This volume of clients can only be reached through significant reductions in the cost of MFI’s operation and a quantum leap in the scale at which the industry functions.

The response to this imperative for reduced cost and increased scale must include the optimum use of technologies that are available or that can feasibly be put in place, as well of credit bureaus and credit scoring.

We started our discussions with the promise that we would engage in a round of critical and in-depth analysis of what has worked in these areas and what needs to be done differently and more efficiently and effectively. Fortunately, we did not inaugurate this meeting with the idea or the promise that after three days of discussion we would be able to take a vote and announce to the world the answers to the questions posed by the pursuit of greater access to finance. Indeed, if anything, our attempts to find answers to questions often yielded a harvest of new questions.

Productive inquiry begins with the asking of the right questions, so, if all this meeting produced was a greater clarity of the issues that we need to address, our assembling here in Washington would have been of tremendous value. But we believe that we also achieved at least four other advantages. These are:

• A greater understanding of each other’s concerns, which, as we have seen at the level of individual partnership arrangements, is critical to any progress in the access to finance area.
• A greater awareness of each other’s successes, which we believe, are a necessary encouragement as we continue with the enormous task that access to finance represents.
• An understanding that the idea that every problem represents an opportunity is, in the context of access to finance, more than a jargon, and is in fact the only mindset that we can afford to take to the challenges and opportunities that beckon us.
• A belief that prevailing opportunities for reaching the next 2 or 3 billion of the world’s financially excluded inhabitants represent nothing less than a tipping point that we cannot afford either to ignore or to mismanage.

When the Meeting Began

So when we opened our meeting on Monday, what were the questions we set out to answer? Perhaps there were four main ones:

• How can we take advantage of the growth in MFI investments, lending volumes and outreach and the availability of a range of financial technologies to increase scale and reduce costs in microfinance operations with a view to increasing access to finance for those who still lack such access?
• How can the establishment and functioning of credit bureaus and the use of credit scoring enhance decision-making, portfolio management and other MFI functions?
• Is the suggested approach destined to leave the poor exactly where they are, or does it really have the potential to transform the financial sector in both developed and developing countries and generate what one speaker called a seismic shift in the circumstances of people in the developing world?
• And to look at that question another way, what are the likely consequences—for the financially disenfranchised, for the MFI as we know it today and for the new actors responding to the opportunities and challenges of access to finance—represented by the new disaggregated business model and the attempt to employ second-generation solution to first-generation problems.

After some 50 people have spoken on stage and many hundreds more taken questions and answers in the audience, some salient ideas.

The Technological Imperative

• While not understating the concerns that some have expressed on the possible negative impacts of certain technological innovations, there seems general agreement that using financial technologies in the pursuit of access to finance is not a question of whether or even of when, but one of how.

• Need to focus on the back end for information systems. “The back end is broken.”

• Interoperability

• Balancing need for a common platform perhaps based on open source technology (as against a plethora of individually customized systems) with the need to do sufficient customization to meet the peculiar needs of clients at the bottom of the pyramid.

• Cultural requirements—Multilanguage, literacy and related concerns.

The Efficiency, Transparency and Accountability Imperative

• As with technology, the use of credit bureaus and the introduction of some form of credit scoring are a sine qua non for financial institutions wishing to avail themselves of the opportunity to reach masses of potential clients without losing control of the management of the decisioning and portfolio-management processes.

• Increased presence of credit bureaus in emerging markets.

• Again, meeting the specific needs and circumstances of the target market.
Experiments, Experiences and Successes in Innovation

• We’ve received reports of a wide array of studies, plans, experiments, experiences and successes that seem to establish that, given the right circumstances and correct actions, innovation can work.

• These vary from the project being developed by CGAP and Xac Bank Mongolia to more mature examples in Kenya, India, and the Philippines.

• The experience of Alieu Conteh, who started the first GSM network in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The Need to Balance Optimism with Realism

•This conference provided us with many moments when we could easily have been tempted to see the glass not only as half full, but as approaching the three-quarter mark. We should therefore thank those who kept calling us back to a  recognition of the reality and reminding us that, despite the wonderful successes, we are engaged in a work in progress, indeed a work barely begun. So we have to balance optimism with realism.

The Requirements, Benefits and Challenges of Partnership

However, one of the great takeaways from our discussions is the importance—indeed the inevitability—of conceiving, establishing and managing effective partnerships if we are to be successful either on the credit bureau/credit scoring or the technological side of the equation.

Bringing together elements previously seen as discrete—e.g. a large international bank and a small MFI/NGO, an international mobile-phone provider and a local bank downscaling to the microfinance market, or perhaps a larger consortium of actors including a systems provider, a number of MFIs, a credit bureau and a regulatory agency. Not to mention the silent partners, i.e. the hundreds or thousands of underserved clients.

Only a thin line stands between such actors being partners and becoming competitors—or between their working together at this important enterprise or walking away from the table.

Potential fault lines in this relationship relating to such variables as the sharing of fees and the question of exclusivity need to be carefully managed.

The Urgent Need for a Generation of Visionary Regulators

The need for an inviting regulatory framework, long a challenge in the world of microfinance, becomes even more critical with the degree of experimentation, the possible high investment costs and the larger number of stakeholders that must be managed in this new phase of access to finance.

Regulators now need not only to understand the distinctions between MFIs and the traditional banking sector but also the requirements and challenges of combining the peculiarities of different sectors and technologies—principally telecommunications and banking and finance.

The Future of MFIs

How could the management and sustainability of the “group loan” methodology be affected by both credit scoring and mobile lending?

Danger of the ethic, or the very existence, of the MFI being forgotten if not threatened by the emerging discourse between banks downscaling to reach the microfinance market and mobile phone providers becoming aware of that market.

Abbas Sikander’s (Tameer Bank) encouraging revelation of how he emerged from his identity crisis and his confusion about the future MFI role early in the conversations at his meeting an awareness that the growing interest of these new players and what they bring to the table represent new opportunities for MFIs.